Jump to content

CN Tower & Smoke Stack


LenMarriott

Another shoebox rescue. Exposure data lost to antiquity. Taken in the 1980's and I doubt that today (Jan., 2013) that the smoke stack is still standing. I remember thinking at the time that the contrasts shown here were worth recording. I still do. Best, LM.


From the category:

Architecture

· 101,961 images
  • 101,961 images
  • 296,362 image comments


Recommended Comments

Len, interesting combination of these two sky puncturing construction. The represents industrial and the other mostly post industrial era. Very graphical and the angle you presented makes it more dynamical. Great result for your efforts!

Link to comment

This being in your backyard, so to speak, I'm not surprised it caught your eye.  I don't think this combo can be duplicated today as I think the smoke stack is gone.  The angle of the elements was more to fit as much as possible into the frame as it was artistic license.  Makes me yearn for summer again.  :-)  Best, LM.

Link to comment
Nice comparison ,in the both engineering and purpose perspective,though the lack of any foundation have abolished the size comparison ratio.
Link to comment

I guess the reason I took this was to compare the old and new technologies.  There was too much ground clutter for a decent composition so I decided this disembodied approach was best.  The smoke stack was much closer to me so a distorted comparison would have resulted anyway.  Great point though.  Thanks for your most welcome visit.  Best, LM.

Link to comment

Thanks for taking the time.  I see you are new to PN.  Try posting some photos and see what comes back to  you in the way of comments\critiques.  Best, LM.

Link to comment

Then there might be a political thing here:  a tower from which smoke might come next to a tower that could  emit "smoke screens".... could  even be more diabolical in b&w..   ):-)

Link to comment

Politically, the one on the right was doomed.  Smoke hadn't passed through it for some years at the time I took this shot.  I think difference in the construction technologies is interesting.  About 100 years apart.  Thanks for your thoughts.  Best, LM.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...