Jump to content
© copyright Mark Geistweite 2011

whydangle

Exposure Date: 2011:10:22 05:28:37;
Make: Canon;
Model: Canon EOS 60D;
Exposure Time: 1/320.0 seconds s;
FNumber: f/16.0;
ISOSpeedRatings: ISO 100;
ExposureProgram: Other;
ExposureBiasValue: 0
MeteringMode: Other;
Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode;
FocalLength: 25.0 mm mm;
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh;

Copyright

© copyright Mark Geistweite 2011
  • Like 1

From the category:

Landscape

· 290,378 images
  • 290,378 images
  • 1,000,006 image comments


Recommended Comments

I'm prepared to respond to the critiques about the ostentatious sunstar. "Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!". In other words, I like the effect. It creates drama when no real drama existed. Well, what I mean to say is that the sky was as bland as rice cakes, so I needed to infuse about the only thing that would offer some drama. In this case, the last light kissing the tops of the trees produced chiaroscuro lighting from a brilliant light source. That's a recipe for some drama on a day that really had nothing to offer other than the incredible foliage. As incredible as it was, I felt it needed a little more intensity, so blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!

Link to comment
Really beautiful colors and light! Congratulations. From me 7/7 Kind regards, Olaf
Link to comment

OK, Mark, here's a bit of blah, blah. I would crop it just below the complete blowout of the sun so that you are left with the beautiful rays only. That works better for me, and is a lot more subtle to boot.

Link to comment

I dont see drama in the Sun, I see a massive distraction to what is a very colourful landscape. To me the sun offers no appeal at all. Does drama in the sky need to compete with the elegance of colour and contracst in the landscape, I dont think so, Thats my Blah Blah.

Link to comment

Beautiful image. Wonderful colours, and the blown out sun doesn't distract me one bit. Well done! Regards.

Link to comment

Thanks Olaf, Richard, Jeff, Richard and Margo! Jeff, that crop would work well and as you said, make it more subtle. I appreciate the feedback. I would say that would give me two images, because I would not likely discard the less subtle of the two. I like it. Richard, it really must be a personal thing. I have always been attracted to images that have a sunstar (not just mine, but from other photogs). In this case, I can agree that much of the sun has blown. A tighter sunstar would have been better, but the light was so harsh. I know Jeff avoids the sun like the plague, but I actually seek it because there is something special to me about strong backlighting. Once the sun was down, I continued shooting for the "elegance of color and contrast" and came away with the more subtle landscapes. I like both!

Link to comment

Mark, the sun is incredible, perfect, and justifies the brilliant backlit trees. No problem from me, I think it is great! I'm sure happy to see that somebody else around here uses this effect.

Link to comment

This version for its greater depth range, not to mention brilliance. Love the quiet second scene composition all on its own to the left. 

Link to comment

Hi Mark, I also use a 60D and CS3. I wish I was as good with mine as you are with yours. I like it! It's perfect just as it is. Thank You for doing it the way you did.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...