hearst 0 Posted February 5, 2003 I thought this would do very well in competition, but it has not been all that well received. What could I do to improve it (other than going back to Jasper and waiting for another rainbow)? Link to comment
jeff nichols 0 Posted February 5, 2003 Joe, I would bet most people who scroll through photos open this one up...it is striking. but when you see the larger version, the foreground becomes somewhat distracting, and the main hill appears to be not completely in focus. I am not a member (low on cash), so cant crop this for you, but I think a crop centering the central hump and including as much of the sky as you can get and as little as the foreground would make a stronger picture...but if that hump isnt in focus your left with what you captured. nice photo though...be happy with that. Link to comment
oliver_indra 0 Posted February 5, 2003 Then where does the rainbow come from and why does it end at the edge of the hill? Rainbows are dependent on your point of view and not on the landscape. Or am I completely wrong? Grees, Link to comment
j_yabrow1 0 Posted February 5, 2003 where does the rainbow come from and why does it end at the edge of the hill? Observing rainbows depends on the angle between you & the sun w.r.t the water droplets (mist) that reflect and refract the sun's light. The rainbow's abrupt cut-off by the hill could simply indicate that the mist is behind the mountain, not in front. Check out this site for more rainbow info: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/blynds/rnbw.html Link to comment
naked_photographer_paulie_ 0 Posted February 5, 2003 Another good shoot. Good feeling. Link to comment
oliver_indra 0 Posted February 5, 2003 I see the point in the explanation above. You are right. I guess I was just sitting in front of this pic saying to myself "it can not be!". But yes, it can! Grees and sorry!, Link to comment
robert_tilden1 0 Posted February 5, 2003 Needs the Palace of Napal instead of a mountain. Actually, I agree with you, this is a winner. You should feel good regardless. Link to comment
WJT 627 Posted February 6, 2003 Well maybe not, but certainly a rare shot. If I recall my basic physics correctly, theoretically all rainbows are double. But we hardly ever see the second one because of illumination of the sky. You are quite lucky to capture one on film. Even rarer to have one in such a great setting as this. Maybe you will get your 'pot of gold' soon. Link to comment
robert_ton1 0 Posted February 6, 2003 Joe -- you asked for comments. This is a great shot, but to my eye it lacks foreground detail. That is, it appears a little fuzzy, and maybe a little too dark. I would expect this in the rainbow and sky. Maybe it's just the scan? Great work in any case. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now