rudolf_kartelin 4 Posted November 3, 2010 All the photos on the website are for sale. For information contact me at rossa103@yandex.ru.. Link to comment
lintrathen 14 Posted November 3, 2010 Rudolf...... I am no prude, in fact quite the opposite but I find no artistic value in this image. Sorry.Regards Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted November 3, 2010 This image does not emphasize at all the sensuality and beauty of the female figure. This image does just the opposite; it is an almost grotesque expression of a woman's figure.Lighting is also poor and uneven and the color tends toward green.Sorry to be so critical, but I calls 'em like I sees 'em (I DO NOT waste my time or yours with meaningless "great job, awesome!!!!" posts) and this section is, after all, for critiques. Link to comment
dds701 0 Posted November 4, 2010 Sorry, this image is not liked at all. It is a deviation from the typical nudes as most are attractive or at least well proportioned, this one is suitable only for BBW lovers. Best regards Link to comment
rudolf_kartelin 4 Posted November 4, 2010 Dear Grayham Allot, Scott Murphy, Doug Settle.This is only the forms that I give my impressions. The figure is tense.Willing to stand up. Ready for action. I see the character shapes.If you do not understend or do not see it, just look at the womens body.Rudolf Link to comment
billevoy 0 Posted November 4, 2010 Very interesting and real. Shows that figure photos don't have to be Playboy style. There are only a few folks publishing this kind of work. If they had the old ratings scheme, I would give this 7 for originality. Link to comment
.th 0 Posted November 13, 2010 "It is a deviation from the typical nudes..." and if for nothing else, it should be applauded. Fuck there is some serious narrow-mindedness going on at this site. But then, one out of four is perhaps not that bad... Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted November 14, 2010 Thorir, not only is your comment completely uncalled for, it makes no sense.Leave your vulgarity at the door. Link to comment
.th 0 Posted November 14, 2010 It must have gotten lost in the translation then. Vulgarity was indeed uncalled for, but the thought never crossed my mind that what I said might offended anyone. If it did, I apologize. But I refuse to accept that others than model-figured females should not be photographed nude, because of stereotypical beauty values. I do agree with you on one thing though, that the "great job, awesome!!!!" posts are useless. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted November 14, 2010 Thorir I will agree with you that a model does not have to be 5'5" and 105 lbs to be sexy nude. I am over 50, and personally I think a shapely woman in her early 40's can be just as, if not more beautiful, than a woman in her 20's. It's all in your perspective I guess. Link to comment
donireland 0 Posted February 12, 2011 I personally loved this image , a real woman showing her REAL body not a surgeon / magazine inspired barbie doll.......... congrats to you and the model for putting this shot together ....... Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now