Jump to content

Mt. Plattkofel


sambal

Exposure Date: 2010:09:25 09:51:22;
Make: Canon;
Model: Canon EOS 450D;
ExposureTime: 1/125 s;
FNumber: f/11;
ISOSpeedRatings: 200;
ExposureProgram: Aperture priority;
ExposureBiasValue: -2/3;
MeteringMode: Pattern;
Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode;
FocalLength: 28 mm;
Software: PaintShop Photo Pro 13.00;


From the category:

Landscape

· 290,394 images
  • 290,394 images
  • 1,000,007 image comments


Recommended Comments

Sam, I think this where a graduated neutral density filter (or a digital blend) would have helped to balance the very light sky and mountains with the more subdued light on the foreground. It's a great landscape, but the power of the mountain is diminished, I think, by the relative overexposure. I've done a very quick blend to illustrate what I mean (the white area on the right is probably completely featureless in the original photo).  I'd like to see even more contrast in the sky, which might be possible with more work.

18297717.jpg
Link to comment

Stephen,

thanks very much for your comments, critique and recommendations.

I'll keep those in mind when I'll find myself in a comparable situation again.

Cheers,

Sam

Link to comment

But Sam, that was just my opinion, and you may have had something entirely different in mind when you took and posted the photo.  I can imagine someone wanting to keep the mountains light, putting them more in the background compared to the foreground, as if to "suggest" their presence rather than make their presence so obvious.  I commented without knowing your intentions, so I may have missed the mark entirely.  On the other hand, if you like the suggested edit, then my comment may have been useful.

Link to comment

Hi. I think Stephen's interpretation works better for me. My immediate reaction before reading the comments was that the upper half looked too washed out, although the overall exposure looks fine. The ND grad idea seems to work well - for me at least.

Link to comment

Yes, I see what the three of you mean.

My observation of reality is more the washed out version of this image.

Light intensity in Europe is usually a lot less than in, say, the US of A where one is able to see features much more clearly. Also, the air here in Europe is more polluted, causing vaguer pictures.

Of coursel with software & filters it is possible to adjust any image to one's personal taste or experience. IMO in photography, like in real life, reality doesn't exist but is a subjective interpretation and reaction of the human mind on external stimuli.

How about that?

Cheers, Sam

 

 

Link to comment

Right on.  Keep an open mind to the opinions of others, but in the final analysis it's your own opinion that really counts.  You're photographing for yourself, not others.

Link to comment

Hi Sam,

A nice looking scene regardless how it is processed.

For me,technically,  I would not consider using a good 28mm lens at F/11, as I like to see sharper details in the tree tops and beyond.

Best Regards,  Mike

Link to comment

Gail,

that was one of those days with unexpected light snowfall decorating Mother Nature's higher located shapes.

The contrast between the lower situated greenery & the rock with powder sugar makes it a piece of cake, as it were.

Thanks very much for your enthusiasm.

cheers

Sam

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...