gsphotoguy 2 Posted October 24, 2010 I suppose this is an unusual nude portrait but we were playing a bit and I'm interested in other's thoughts. Link to comment
Pierre Dumas 231 Posted October 25, 2010 But I mast remark on the lack of eyes! A portrait must content at least one hand and eye if not more, ha! So said the book when I learned about composition when I was 13!PDE Link to comment
John Peri 1,003 Posted October 25, 2010 My learned friend above makes wonderful compositions, but I think that we must sometimes learn to think outside of the texbook also .. haha, that I stopped reading in fact when I was around 13 ! The face, remarkably given how little of it we see, tells us mountains. I love the little dimple cumulating in a smile, or the other way around. That is what is so magical about thi photo ... Link to comment
niki3 0 Posted October 25, 2010 there are strong contrasts of tone that makes this inmage particular. catch the eye Link to comment
gsphotoguy 2 Posted October 31, 2010 Pierre - I think John made the point well. I use those books only as a guide and liked the result I got by moving awat from the rules.John - Thank you for defending me:-) I liked the hair falling over her face even though it covered most of it. Her dark lipstick also provided a detail I tought worked.Niki - I feel you undersand what I was going for, thank you.Maurizio - Thank you as always.-Mark Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now