stp 6 Posted May 23, 2010 These shadows are pretty harsh, and the tonal range is quite wide -- a pretty difficult challenge for Velvia. Link to comment
garyowen 17 Posted May 24, 2010 I'd agree with Velvis 50, but with the 100 it seems to have more flexability! Thank for the comment! Link to comment
stp 6 Posted May 24, 2010 In my experience the limited latitude is characteristic of all of the Velvia films. Astia, on the other hand, has a wider latitude, although the colors are not as saturated. For a situation like you had, I would have recommended a color negative film -- their exposure latitude is much great than that of transparencies. I seldom use color negative film because I haven't found a cheap way to get a proof sheet to know which frames I should scan and which frames I should just throw away. When I did use color negative, I loved Kodak Portra and did not like Kodak Ektar (which people seem to either love or hate). Link to comment
garyowen 17 Posted May 24, 2010 I also like portra 160 both VC and NC, as well as the old agfa vista 200 films. I'm started to proceed into the stage of my life where I can't get out and do as much photograph as I used to, but I still love every minute of it! Link to comment
stp 6 Posted May 24, 2010 Gary, same here. I had to trade my Pentax 67 for a 645 just because of the weight. Nevertheless, photography keeps me going -- I simply love the process and the connection it helps me to make with landscapes. Link to comment
garyowen 17 Posted June 11, 2010 Thank you for taking your time and writting a critques! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now