daniel montero 0 Posted December 22, 2009 red color due to a microalgae Dunaliella sp., rich on betha carotene. your comments are welcome Link to comment
amitai schwartz 0 Posted December 23, 2009 Very interesting capture. I think it might work better if you cropped off the big red band at the top. I find this is almost two photos in one. One is a nice pattern of the tide and the birds and the color. And the other is a red reflective abstract. My eye doesn't know where to go. I don't think the two parts go together well. But I really like the pattern and color on the bottom. Link to comment
pimderuijter 0 Posted December 23, 2009 I really like the composition, but the colors of this photo seem to be a little bit odd (on my screen). The upper part of the water looks pink/purple. Is that your intention? Link to comment
daniel montero 0 Posted December 23, 2009 dear pim. those are the natural colours of this lagoon,. try to find "laguna colorada bolivia" in google image and you can check it . as pointed out, the water of this lagoon is rich on microalgae Dunaliella sp, witth high content on betha-carotene, a reddish pigment. This is because flamingos are there and this is because flamingos are pink. Link to comment
nicolaus_wegner 0 Posted December 23, 2009 I do not understand why this image has been rated so low. I find it to be very interesting and unique. My only critique would be to crop the image a bit to keep the eye focused on the curve through the middle. Thanks for explaining the water color. Link to comment
victor_montero 0 Posted December 23, 2009 ¡Vaya "flamencada" ávida nutriéndose!. No leventan cabeza. Bonita composición. Qué bien has conseguido distribuír las tonalidades de los colores: oscuros al fondo, yendo aclarándose hasta adelante. Buenos en encuadre y el enfoque. Besos, hijo. Link to comment
katzpjs 50 Posted December 30, 2009 I will agree with Amitai that some of the top can be cropped out without hurting the image but improving upon it. You have a strong lens here, were you shooting at the full 400mm or less? I only ask this because I would love to be able to see more definition in the flamingos. A nice shot but I find myself wanting to see more from here. I'll search your portfolio to see if you have other shots. Link to comment
daniel montero 0 Posted December 30, 2009 Hi shawn. Lens was used at 400. I have other versions of this place. I will submit them soon. Cheers Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now