cedarbough 0 Posted October 30, 2001 Sometimes I think people confuse a photo of a newsworthy or beautiful object with a photo that is worth showing off. I don't care who or what the photo is of, if it's not a good photo, I'm not interested in seeing it. You must surely agree that there is nothing great about this photo. And other people who've shot Clinton managed to achieve focus and didn't overexpose. Perhaps they even had a non-distracting backdrop. Link to comment
tim_vanblaricom 0 Posted November 1, 2001 What the hell is that brown thing on his nose???? Link to comment
robertaguilar 0 Posted November 2, 2001 It's a zit like wart. It was actually very nasty. As for Cedar's comments, this photo is what it is, all I can say is don't "player hate", you should congradulate. :) Link to comment
allan500 0 Posted November 21, 2001 It's not at all a bad grab shot. If you have a camera in your hands and along comes a celebrity, you make the picture. You had the right instincts. Good for you. Link to comment
jim_yarbrough 0 Posted December 6, 2003 Dont be discouraged...one thing I'm nearly tired of on photo.net is all of the seasoned pro's being such jack----- to those who are learning. They have obviously forgotten their roots. Link to comment
jason_whiteguy 0 Posted December 7, 2003 I like the shot. Sure, it's not the prettiest thing, but presidents and other famous people are always made to look superhuman. Clearly Clinton was caught off guard, looking quite human--especially with that horrid thing on his nose. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now