Jump to content

Reflexion II



Camara: Nikon D-100, Objetivo: Nikkor 28 mm. Tripode, Velocidad 1/60 segundos, Diafragma f/22 Filtro: Polarizador+ U,V. .


From the category:

Landscape

· 290,390 images
  • 290,390 images
  • 1,000,006 image comments




Recommended Comments

Where do you live to capture such beautiful images like this Julio?. May i ask if you have to use Photoshop to enhance the colors?. Warm regards, Tanya.
Link to comment

I try to take time with your photo's Julio and really view their beauty as all your work is so wonderfully done.

Very beautiful, the color and reflection just gorgeous.

 

Best wishes Andrea

Link to comment
Gracias Julio... como van los animos, veo muy poco movimiento en tu galeria y eso me preocupa... yo empezando a calentar motores a ver si se nos pega un poco de inspiracion porque llevo casi un par de anyos que no levanto cabeza, cuando no por trabajo y cuando no por problemas de familia... que dilema. No se si te ha dado tiempo de leer el texto explicativo de la ultima foto, sino echale un vistazo. Ta la proxima apanyero
Link to comment

Julio, this is another one of your breathtaking images. Beautiful doesn't seem to be enough of a word to describe this scene!

 

Wonderful!

 

deb

Link to comment
It is amazing how such a simple scene and composition can become a spectacular work of art when put in the hands of someone with great vision, and fantastic control of their camera. Hats off to you.
Link to comment
The reflections and the composition is really nice. But differently from the other, I find the sky way over processed. in fact, the far distant sky looks rather fake.
Link to comment
What's even more interesting is how a photo that once was considered amazing back in 2005 now is considered over-processed and somewhat average. Technology moves fast. For me, I see many problems with the integrity of the image. Most glaringly is the blown highlights in the clouds, only after the overly dark blue (almost black) sky tones. The contrast is over-reaching. No doubt, it is an almost instant winner because of these attributes, but take the over-processing out and it is just another cloudy sky over still water. I know I sound rather harsh in my assessment, but it is an honest critique. This is more flash over substance in my eyes. please understand, my opinion is one of many. The rubber meets the road in how the image is received by the majority. The majority is easily impressed!
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...