Le paysagiste II

Feel free to critique.

belle composition, tres bonne nuance de gris

. . . wouldn't this be better without the small distracting figure?

The "distracting figure" is part of the story, and is not distracting at A3 format.

what a beautiful thing you did..i love it..

Excellent

The one thing I really appreciate in your pictures is the amount of thought in each one.This picture has alot going for it my only critique is The rocks have a slight flat look to them.I would do some more tweeking in this area so there is more focus in the areas you want our eyes to go to.Keep up the good work and I'm looking forward to seeing more of your art.Cheers!

Desole, mais c'est genial.

very imaginative stuff perfectly executed. Like it alot!

Du grand art!!

[The "distracting figure" is part of the story] Perhaps it is that my imagination works better when it is not pushed/pulled too much.

Very well executed. This composition seems to be made out of a chield dream or thougt. Very beautiful! Congratulations.

Critiquer ??? Mais c'est IMPOSSIBLE !!! C'est un chef d'oeuvre !

You're THE master of dreamlike worlds.

A delight for my mind, thanks for sharing with us.

I'd like to see the small distracting figure just a tiny bit separate from the rock behind him, just moved a tweak to the right so he stands out a tad more clearly and his tow rope could get sharpened just a wee bit, I lose it into the background - he'd seem more important and yet more insignificant at the same time if that makes sense.

I agree with Kate Hatton's comment but would add that the rope from the child to the rock appears too fake. It goes straight into the rock(?) with no attachment yet all the other rope attachments are done well - pity!

Now we know how the stones were moved to build the Great Pyramids of Egypt. Thanks for clearing up this mystery!