single photos the redhead man

I will apreciate any coment about this. Thanks. Andr鳠Respaldiza

beno muy interesante tu foto mi amigo andres, me gusta la perspectiva y el efecto de luz que le distes, muy interesante..... have a good luck....

Wow lots of 7/7's. Must be really good!

A manipulated rating !!!! 4/4

impossible to rate :-) the good place should 4/4

VERY WRONG.

 

WHY IS THIS PICTURE SO PROMINENT?

I'LL LOOK FORWARD TO READING ABOUT THIS IN THE FORUMS. JVK

4/4

Ha...don't u see its the perfect picture?

Un bello trabajo tecnico ` perfecto.. un cordial saludo.

no i dont see

7/7 is a joke .. who can believe it ?

Wow this is still here? I was wondering late last night why this was still here in the #1 spot. It's really not a good photo at all. The image quality is poor, especially in the very large version. I find nothing interesting about this photo at all. I'd probably give it a 3/2 if I could... and that's being nice.

 

I don't get how there are 10 7/7 ratings, but they don't show in the details. Some one found an exploit in the rating system?

fool play?

4/4

i wonder!

i just cannot find anything special about this one ...

i am sorry

 

4/4

big mistake ... 3/4 max.

Some one Must Be Joking...?

This is an unfortunate manipulation of the system.

i definatly like the shot of the former king of thailand Rama V! (ther photo above mr red head) i would say the photo in the background is a great photo!

location peru?!?!?! NOT!!! some drunk guy in thailand!

Can somebody please explain what is going on here.. I have no idea. 4/4

2/5

Overrated?

 

Of COURSE!!!

how the hell is this on the top slot of ratings? this is a poor technical picture all around....very amateur.

Finally, the wait is over!

 

Now, the perfect picture has been revealed, it is time to go home, bury our cameras, and uninstall our softwares. RIP my sweet K1000.

 

-m.ozgur

The fact this image IS still here might make you think about what other sorts of manipulations are concocted by administrators of this site ... and why?