d2f 0 Posted October 10, 2004 image is technically weak, the expression is fair to midland, overall just an average snapshot. It lacks connection to the wedding, for example if she were holding flowers or showing the bride out of focus in the background and the childs's eyes looking that way, or something along those lines. Instead we have an incomplete image who's only saving grace is the eyes. Link to comment
todd. 0 Posted October 10, 2004 Don't mind Don, he has no heart. This image is quite touching. I really like it. It's not technically perfect, but to me, it captures a lot of feeling. To me, that is more important than "clarity." Link to comment
ethan_lewis 0 Posted October 11, 2004 Don Farra is correct in pointing out that this picture has no connection to the wedding...but since when does it have to be? This photo doesn't have to be a "wedding photo" It's simply a great portrait. The eyes are what really make this picture. It seems she's looking for something. Perhaps she momentarily lost her parents? Perhaps her parents are just preoccupied with other considerations. I know that when I went to weddings as a little kid, I always found them rather bewildering, and felt a little out of place. Being somewhat invisible is both a blessing and a curse of childhood. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now