brandonhamilton 0 Posted September 22, 2004 Way underexposed. Because the harsh light on the kid's left arm fooled your camera's in-camera meter, a tiny bit of post produciton can help this photo. Here is a different version fixed in photoshop in less then 1 minute. Link to comment
rodrigo_faria 0 Posted September 23, 2004 Thanks for the critique, but i really don't agree with the underexposed issue (for instance I prefered the first photo. Darker shadows on the child's face makes it a more expressive photo) and yes, I did not use photoshop. Anyway, thanks. Link to comment
brandonhamilton 0 Posted September 23, 2004 Rodrigo.. I understand that excepting a negative critique is tough, especially if you aren't used to it. Technically, the "Shadows" on the face were virtually untouched and are just as dark in my version. The original is very flat, very low contrast, and unpleasing to the eye. If you don't think it is underexposed, I recommend some basic photo classes. First question to ask in class is "how does 18% grey relate to in-camera metering". Even a simple glance at the tonal range of this image will show you it's underexposure. It's ok, you just keep shooting. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now