richard_lowery 0 Posted July 28, 2001 ---following the suggestions of critiquers here, (Blago , David, Albert, et.al) see the results. (1) Scanned at 600dpi rather than 400dpi, (2) Cropped left and bottom (3)Added green tint (4) Increased sharpness (5) Adjust ambience (with Ulead photo manipulation rather than reflector, --Albert) and (6) reduced size. Does too many 'cooks' spoil the soup so to speak, or is the result from all the advice valid? What??? Now a perfect picuture!! Quote Link to comment
bas1 0 Posted July 29, 2001 Just isn't sharp, at least not on the web. With these, with all respect, cliche shots. It all evolves around excecution. Lighting isn't stagering either. So what is left is butterflies against a green background. And against the competion I'm seeing on this site that ain't good enough Regards Bas Quote Link to comment
g1 0 Posted August 10, 2001 You have some beautiful butterfly pics in your folder. Some with more detail & focus, but this is my fave. The diagonal shift of the flowers & the fact there are two butterflies following that shift, really appeal to me. Quote Link to comment
richard_lowery 0 Posted August 15, 2001 --this is a revision of the original following suggestions of Blagoy öåíêóëîâ Quote Link to comment
m._ort 0 Posted February 22, 2002 Great image -- nice composition. It is probably the scan, but I wish the image were a touch sharper. Have you tried sharpening it a wee bit in Photoshop or Corel Photohouse? Kind regards, m. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Comments