test11664875106 0 Posted May 10, 2004 Lovely! Hands' motion adds to the mood as does wide angle. Was it 35mm or around? Link to comment
berniek 0 Posted May 10, 2004 A bit of Diane Arbus influence or a tad of Mary Ellen Mark? Interesting portrait! Link to comment
yan-retro 0 Posted May 11, 2004 Very strange distortion! May be you cropped a bit right side. Usually, this kind of wide angle lens usage is risky but this provoked certain uneasiness, with a help of movement, that caught my eyes. So the photograph is interesting! Bravo. Link to comment
sprouty 0 Posted May 12, 2004 Very compelling. Wish I could offer more, but sometimes an image just strikes a chord. Link to comment
john schroeder 0 Posted May 12, 2004 I wouldn't crop at all. She is nicely framed by the door and the object on the left. The 21mm was used perfectly. This picture is so sweet. The longer I look the more I like it. Her expression is wonderfull. Link to comment
neurocat 0 Posted May 12, 2004 Thanks for all the comments. This is cropped top & bottom, sadly, only because my large print wouldn't fit on my scanner. The camera, with 21mm lens, is great. I shot this at 1/8 second hand-held which is why you can see movement in her hands. Link to comment
peterbilitch 0 Posted August 3, 2004 Teresa, I am not entirely sure what to make of this hauntingly disturbing quality to the image. The aesthetic impact however is certainly there. Peter Link to comment
dumpster001 1 Posted August 22, 2004 divine. someone above nailed it by referring to Arbus and MEMark.. lovely work throughout, congrats! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now