arjen van de merwe 0 Posted April 8, 2004 Wow! This one gives me the creeps. The bottom is so small it must be a child. The man's hand is grabbing it forcefully. Are you commenting on child abuse? Link to comment
c brake 0 Posted April 9, 2004 I would think 3 or 4 or 5 times before posting something like this. Link to comment
c brake 0 Posted April 9, 2004 I would think 3 or 4 or 5 times before posting something like this. And then I would put the hand's owner in a world of hurt. I will not rate this because it would be a rating based on a purely emotional reaction and not based on the content of photo itself and because it does not deserve any other but the lowest of ratings. Link to comment
the alchemist 0 Posted April 9, 2004 You need to look very carefully at a photo before you go accusing someone of child pornography. Given a moderately petite adult model, my own hand (I'm 6') would be approximately the same scale in relation to the model as is shown in this image. Plus, if you look carefully at the physical development of the hip structure you can clearly see that this is a physically mature woman. Neither children or men have that classic narrow waist and wide hips. And I have never seen curves that voluptuous on such an apparently slender figure in any young child. While I must admit to a moment of initial doubt myself when viewing this image. I quickly figured this out and have to commend the photographer on a well composed and simple image that really sparks some serious dicussion and controversy. Link to comment
johnny_tergo 0 Posted April 9, 2004 I don't really care for this image, just not my thing. HOWEVER, I would definetly hold back judgment against the photographer, in reguards to this being a child. I know that my hand is about that size in relation to my wife. I am 6'1" 210 XL hands and she is a tiny little 5'6" 100lb woman. Link to comment
maco_maco 0 Posted April 11, 2004 The photographer is from Czech Republic and the world is a little different in Europe than in USA (I am from Slovakia). I can easily imagine seeing this kind of picture in national magazine that reads 20% of the population. But here is the US it will be unthinkable. And even if that is a child on the picture I would never call it a kid porn. Great picture by the way (creates controversy and that is sign of good photograph). Link to comment
marcelk 0 Posted April 11, 2004 :))) funny comments look here same women(26y) and same hand :)) Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now