christopher_trader 0 Posted January 18, 2004 It's still very artistic, and there is no sex happening. Link to comment
geoffrey_swenson 0 Posted January 19, 2004 All is not because of the naked bodies, just very vulgar. Other than that, it is a banal nothing. Link to comment
alain_martinez 0 Posted January 20, 2004 Your pictures are fantastic. The bodies on these models you photograph are amazing. But the detail and good lighting is even better. Do you pay these girls, or they just like to be photograhed? Link to comment
igor_amelkovich 2 Posted January 20, 2004 They are my girlfriends, and like to be photograhed. Link to comment
yo1 0 Posted January 20, 2004 i like your attitude man, beuatiful pictures, beautiful girlfriends, in black and white, nice! Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted January 20, 2004 I really like the picture, this is NOT porn... Beautiful art of human body... Link to comment
charles_hohenstein 0 Posted January 21, 2004 Anyone who would describe this picture as pornographic has obviously never seen real pornography. The shot is very good at a technical level. I think I would like the posing better if we could see the face of the woman who is facing us. Link to comment
8___d____ 0 Posted January 21, 2004 Congrats on a fantastic portfolio, I especially like the studio shots with black backgrounds. I would be interested to see the same style of shots but with the model's face visible. Link to comment
johnpclevenger 0 Posted March 17, 2004 I like the fact that you do not show their faces. It adds mystery and keeps the focus on the human body. Good work.. Link to comment
thomas_turk 0 Posted March 26, 2004 Of course its porno to Joseph, as he must just have bin mumbo jumboing to his imaginary god, who told him so. Never mind that, I hear the very holy guys in that holy state, spend all their spare time in the whorehouse, cos god wont let them have any nooky with a condo on, and their wives dont want any more kids or VD...Yeah porno to some, photoraphy to others, good or bad or indifferent. This guys shots are very erotic. Is that not the MAIN purpose of nudes....I mean if it is not erotic, it must be a dud shot.. How dare Joseph open this clearly marked erotic section..And how dare he look at that disgusting naked body, while writing his critique..Guess Geoffrey was also mumbo jumboing to his imaginary god, and then, how dare he, also, open a page clearly marked etc etc etc.. Link to comment
pamela_edwards 0 Posted August 12, 2004 Very nice - erotic for sure, but not pornography. But would get many folk's motor running, mine included! Link to comment
glen_woodman 0 Posted December 28, 2005 This photograph in my opinion does not depict porn. They are not engage in a sexual act. there are no faces involved. There is no in your face sexual private parts shown. The line is often blurred between porn and art. Always in the eyes of the viewer. I think this picture has good overall contrast and mystique. Of course that is one man's opinion. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now