reproduction 01

Photographs subjected to your comments...

Stunning - unreal and all the usual protestations...You have done a wonderful job with this. The mode and original photograph is obviously very good. The post production work is quite simply amazing. Many congratulations an a really great image.

Very nice work.

Beautiful!

Very nice. Could you explain what you did in PS to get this beautiful graphic effect ?

You have created a beautiful image, that's true, but the result is a little bit too "digital" for my taste. I would also like to see the unmodified photo. I think this could be a good portrait without treatment, too.

I agree with Timo. This looks like a very nice photo of a very beautiful woman, but the PS treatment has become the subject of this image in my eyes. A more subtle approach might be better.

It looks like airbrush art so I can't say I like or dislike it as a photograph.

I like this effect very much. How did you create it?

...but that's kinda the point, its got a pop art feel. The sort of thing I'd want to take of a girlfriend and hang up in our house at around 30" x 30". Excellent work.

I agree, Jonathon, but saying you like it, or saying you dislike it bears no relavence to photography because what we're looking at is too far removed from photography. It may have started as a photograph, but it didn't end up as one.

It's really an eyecatcher - very good work!

True, it's not a photograph. It's simply an image that I enjoy looking at. But if it started out as a photograph, I'd like to know about the technique involved in its transformation.

Portraiture isn't normally a subject that interests me,but when I saw the thumbnail appear,I couldn't help but take notice.

I think this is very clever and ABSOLUTELY SUPERB.

In the photoshopping process, I think some perspective was lost -- the way the cheekbone on the left sits, in particular, seems to distort her face slightly.

Look to this page :

http://www.mmf-pro.com/tarifs.htm

Did you sell it ?

Fred.

 

 

http://www.mmf-pro.com/images/visuels/couv48p.jpg

Fred is right

where is the photograph hiding? this much photoshop is annoying. i wish i could wipe it off with a damp cloth to see what the original looked like

I do not speak quite English, But this is not a photograph but a drawing entirely carried out with photoshop.

I have to work of many hours to carry out this drawing.

Regards Gildas

 

I do not speak quite English, But this is not a photograph but a drawing entirely carried out with photoshop.

I have to work of many hours to carry out this drawing.

Regards Gildas

 

Why, then, have you submitted it on "photo".net?

Stunning. Beautiful work.

I can appreciate the amount of effort that went into this drawing. However, as you said "this is not a photograph", this is in fact an illustration. You did list a camera used to create this image, so I'll ask if the original photograph was taken by you?

Enough manufactured people! Aren't mannequins disturbing enough? Just cut it out.

The saying goes sh___ floats to the top.

As in many cases before, the work that deserves the least attention winds up at the top of the ratings.