jim schwaiger 0 Posted September 21, 2003 One of those tiems a spot meter would have been useful. I figured the backlighting would confuse the meter so I "underexposed" based on it's reading, but the result was still a little on the high side. I was pleased with the result, detail in the center and still a little bit of color in the sky. Sometimes you just guess right... I see many cropping possibilities here, but this is as close as I could get (the flower was about 12 feet off the ground). I left the bottom edge because I do like the diffraction around the hairs on the stem. Link to comment
csaba_kardos 0 Posted September 21, 2003 Good photo. Seems a bit oveer-exposured, though. Good composition. Link to comment
fred_j._lord 0 Posted September 21, 2003 In dealing with the enormous dynamic range here, it would be difficult to expose it better short of doing two identically framed images and combining them in the computer. I think the center of the flower is the most interesting part of this and that's what is correctly exposed. Link to comment
michael_ward1 0 Posted September 21, 2003 The exposure here is wonderful. It's obviously overexposed, but to good effect. The only place it doesn't really work is on the leaf to the left, but that's easy to overlook in this image. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now