Guest Guest Posted June 22, 2003 Nice portrait with a sweet little motion. It invites to speculate about the person. Link to comment
peta 0 Posted June 22, 2003 A wonderful portrait. I like everything about it, crop, expression, skin tones, lighting. Very good work. I note that my comment doesn't show in your POW...it would have been the second one but I must not have hit 'confirm'! So I'll tell you here I was very happy to see that fabulous image POW. So very well deserved. Congrats Bridget. :) Link to comment
bridget_hunt 0 Posted June 23, 2003 Trying to improve portrait photography, any comments appreciated. Link to comment
robert_gough 0 Posted June 23, 2003 I love this except for one thing: it doesn't look very sharp. If it were I'd give it 7/7. Link to comment
lightwriter2 0 Posted June 23, 2003 nice portrait. I think I would prefer without the slight motion blur (i'm guessing this is on purpose), but still a fine portrait in my opinion. Link to comment
dougityb 0 Posted June 25, 2003 I want to give this higher rates, too, but can't because of the blur. Using the 105 lens works well to compress Sean's face, and your lighting is very nice, and models Sean's face very well. In fact, it's classic "rembrandt" lighting, and it's lighting suited for dashing looking blokes like sean and me who have faces on the thin side. So, if you selected this lighting then you chose well. If you just stumbled on it, then I suggest you study it hard so you can see it the next time. I like your crop, too, and the breathing space on the left. Good Portrait, Bridget, just watch that sharpness. The average portrait is sharp. This has all the hallmarks of a very good, to excellent portrait....except....the blurr. No doubt you were melting at the intensity of his gaze..... Link to comment
mediumformat 2 Posted June 25, 2003 I agree on the blur/motion: don't ride the fence. Either add a lot more motion, or make it sharp. This one is in the middle. Nice portrait though. Link to comment
monika.brand 0 Posted June 26, 2003 1.this is a wonderful portrait2.I have the same problem on "little beauty"So,we have good portraits,which are out of focus -next time we'll do it better.Best wishes,Monika.;-) Link to comment
jody 0 Posted June 27, 2003 I like this. A piercing look. Nice light and composition. I do wish his eyes were in sharp focus, though. Link to comment
joe_garrick 0 Posted June 28, 2003 I find this shot to be the best of those you've posted of Sean. It's an intense expression, but yet not unfriendly. It's certainly fortunate that your eye and his face crossed paths. Link to comment
erin_____grasshopper__rice 0 Posted June 28, 2003 Love It! He's hot, which definetly helps. I have to swim with crowd and say that the blur "bothers" me as well. I'm also not sure howq much I like the ear being included, maybe it would've looked a bit better with only his face...? Anyway- nice portrait. Link to comment
gemccaw 1 Posted June 29, 2003 The slightly soft focus is used to good effect here. I like the tight composition, the window(?)light and his expression. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted June 30, 2003 Well, there's a lot to like here and one thing to be concerned about. Having had a lot of discussions with you until now, I bet you can guess what I like and what I'm concerned with, so no need to regurgitate it here. My strong advice is to return and do another session with Sean. You've cracked open his soul with this shot and think you can explore it again with even more striking results. Despite the single concern, I think you have found your calling. But for the concern, this is a brilliant portrait. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now