Jump to content
© Copyright 2011 Mark Greenfield, All Rights Reserved

Daisy Lake



Exposure Date: 2011:06:19 11:01:38;
Model: Canon EOS-1D Mark III;
Exposure Time: 1/24.679170779861796 seconds s;
FNumber: f/5.65685;
ISOSpeedRatings: ISO 50;
FocalLength: 40.0 mm mm;
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows;

Copyright

© Copyright 2011 Mark Greenfield, All Rights Reserved

From the category:

Landscape

· 290,478 images
  • 290,478 images
  • 1,000,012 image comments


Recommended Comments

Mark,  This is a nicely composed image that has a lot in it.  Might there be more than one image here - this one and one without the stream bed for two?  How you present the image is a matter of how the image speaks to you.  Might the trees on the right be blended a bit more with the brighter greenery to their left. You want to show some detail in the trees, but not emphasize that right front corner.  Please understand that I wouldn't take the time to say all this unless I like the image.  Nice job, well done.  Regards.  Larry

Link to comment

There is one way I know an nature image is 'successful' - it is when I am compelled to reach to Panoramio to locate exactly where the scenic Place actually 'resides'. I know I will in a second. This one is one of but very few Nature images which, to my 'anti-metropolitan' mindskew, is not upset by the powerlines you so excellently subtly captured. Somehow, clean minimally invasive footprint of electrification does not upset the way the stream meanders into the tranquil primeval lake. No logging, no debris, no sign of intrusion other than the minimal sapient trespass... Looks like home.

Link to comment

Mark:  Larry raises an interest idea that there are two images here.  I see the foreground area where the yellow flowers are competing with the lake. I think the lake and the grand view is what makes the shot so the foreground just confuses.  I didn't even notice the power lines until it was mentioned.   Nice shot.  Alan

Link to comment

Hi Larry, Igor & Alan,

Thank you all for your kind words.  I took your suggestions and produced a second version without the river in it.  I have to admit, I'm not totally convinced, but... (see attached file).

Thanks again for your comments.

Mark

20918415.jpg
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...