laura2 0 Posted May 20, 2003 I really love this. It reminds me of monochrome stained glass, with the silhouettes being the lead that holds the pieces of glass together. It doesn't strike me as being Photoshopped, and even if it was, who cares? It's the end product that counts in my eyes, and this is a vision that came true in a fine form. I definitely like it a lot. Did you see how cool it looks with the colors inverted? A bit offtopic, but I just couldn't help but notice. :) Link to comment
matt_kime 0 Posted May 21, 2003 I don't really care for the fog effect. i find it distracting since it doesn't have depth, so it just emphasizes the flatness of the image and adds no detail to the objects. overall, the image falls flat with me. it catches the eye because of all the lines but when i take a closer look i notice that the wheel and the lines overlap and have been brought together by the photographer. its people on a ride at an amusement park with another ride in the background. Link to comment
rkuczinski 0 Posted May 21, 2003 I you would look into my Black&White folder (see link on top) you will notice (referencing the first photo), that this photo is not mixed - it was just taken from another place. Link to comment
root 0 Posted May 21, 2003 I like the composition and the simplicity achieved through high contrast. I, too, would be curious to see what it looks like without the effects. So many netters seem to be impressed by images that are obviously altered, regardless of process, which in turn encourages people to fuss with special effects to the point where the process calls attention to itself. I've fallen prey myself, on occassion. Less is more, IMHO. . Link to comment
marshall 0 Posted May 21, 2003 This image strikes me as reminiscent of a technique I keep hearing called "photo-impressionism," though I'm not sure why it gets that term. Some folks execute this technique through a montage of two slides, both slightly overexposed, one of which is sharp and the other blurred. The montage gets a pretty cool glow, similar to this image. Of course, here it wouldn't be possible to take two separate images ("Now hold that ride perfectly still!"). The post-processing work is evident here, but it does seem to be in service of a vision for the end result, not just an effect experiment. [Yeah, that's just me reading into it myself.] Certainly, anytime there's an effect applied, it won't appeal to everyone, but I also like it in this image. Reality? Not quite, but not all images have to be real... Link to comment
kezia 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Isn't that use of two slides, one unsharp, one sharp, the original technique of "unsharp masking"? I think in moderation it is used to give the effect of sharpened edges, though I'm not sure of the scientific explanation for it. It's easy to do in photoshop, but I have no idea how you would do it in the darkroom without two slides. I like the way it works here, particularly as I agree with the Elves that no matter how weird and interesting a sillouette may be in real life, photographed sillouettes are usually boring - and this isn't. Link to comment
ptucci 0 Posted May 22, 2003 To the poster who felt that the inclusion of the ferris wheel detracts: This image works because of the many different kinds of contrast--straight/curved, black/white, slow/fast. Are there any other contrasts that I've missed? Link to comment
herman_korowdein1 0 Posted May 23, 2003 A rather interesting abstract graphic image, achieved with a camera. If turned by 180 degrees it could be mistaken for an asymmetric spider-web (which "Red-back Spiders" are able to produce!), with some insects caught in it. Link to comment
seven 0 Posted May 23, 2003 It's okay.The line to curve ratio is most impressive.Beyond that: it's a fairly average shot calling on rules for justification. There is to much blur. Link to comment
doug.waldron 0 Posted May 23, 2003 I really like the composition and the high contrast B&W treatment. But the Gaussian blur overlay is just distracting. It looks artificial and Photoshopped. A better use of the technique, IMO (as well as an explanation of how it's done) can be found at Luminous Landscape. Link to comment
scott bulger 0 Posted May 23, 2003 This is one of the few shots that I like better in the thumbnail version. I love the collection of lines and the great contrasts between B&W and the diagonals from the swings intersecting with the circles of the ferris wheel. However, once enlarged, I find the blur/shadow effect overwhelming. The blur/shadow might give it a surreal or dreamlike feeling, but I don't particularly care for it in this instance. I love the root, just not the leaf. Link to comment
shanegbi 0 Posted May 24, 2003 it is great. this is exactly the way how to turn over a common picture onto an artistic expression, bravo Link to comment
mark_gilbert 0 Posted May 24, 2003 This is a beautiful picture. You should be proud of your work and your talent! Link to comment
rick_sidwell 0 Posted May 25, 2003 I see a lot of ambiguity in this photo. The high contrast silhouette treatment removes almost all depth cues, making the photo appear two dimensional. It almost looks like it could have been staged on a light box. But the blurring creates a shadow effect, like the light is coming from the camera's direction instead of from behind the subject. When I look at it for awhile, the ferris wheel seems to shift between going away from the merry-go-round and coming towards it, similar to a Necker Cube. The diagonal chains and waving flags suggest motion, yet there is no motion blur (which is directional, unlike the blur added here). The Elves observed that the photo is edgy yet soft and moody. That is a contradiction, and it is these contradictions put together that give the photo its surreal quality and make it work. Link to comment
sahid_nugroho 0 Posted May 25, 2003 Bravo Rainer! This picture simply shows us how creative you are in composition. Link to comment
vuk_vuksanovic 0 Posted May 25, 2003 Rainer. Congratulations once again! I learned quite a bit a couple of years ago by looking at your work. Link to comment
wieslaw1 0 Posted May 26, 2003 The dark halo is created when you put a softar lens (dutto) during enlarging. It is just reverse effect while during picture taking. Then you have hallation strongest around highlights. It improves the image here. Link to comment
victor chalfant 0 Posted June 11, 2003 I think you've got a really nice and strong composition. Granted, it is busy, but it is a busy scene, and the strong lines give a good sense of the motion. I like the halo, which I believe was achieved by using a difusion filter for part of the exposure. I think it's a nice effect. Link to comment
fabio b 0 Posted June 22, 2003 strong congratulations - not so never-seen-before, but very pleasant Link to comment
rajeevr 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Am very impressed with the photograph , happened to take a similar one , and the editing I did after I took the snap was influenced by this one. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1609809 Link to comment
geza_turi 0 Posted September 1, 2003 More than just a photograph! Very good! Great printing as well and good tones! Geza Link to comment
lorenzo pantani 0 Posted November 30, 2003 Even this image is manipulated, the visual impact is great. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now