Jump to content

Interesting I noticed on this pic everyone is beating it up for being "doctored" and no one seems to get the real problem It's not doctored (except I removed a chain) it's just a poor photograph I sho


gregg_reiter

nikon f2 50mm lens


From the category:

Uncategorized

· 3,406,218 images
  • 3,406,218 images
  • 1,025,779 image comments


User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Sorry, but that's not my taste and a downgrading for a majesty animal like a tiger. This creature needs no accessories beside him. I save my rating and wish, you would present both in separate photos.
Link to comment
Does the pattern of the shadows look a little suspicious to anyone else? Light from one direction on the tiger, another on the woman? The shot looks heavily doctored to me.
Link to comment
An absolutely incredible grab, but I think you'd better check your exposure meter -- this looks about 2 stops overexposed (assuming you were using color negative film).
Link to comment
The 7 goes to the brave girl... As to the photo I think the photographer knows it isn't a good photo..but is a fun concept. The color is off -- too much red in the skin tones and the shadow areas are muddy and milky. This could have been saved by a big diffuser to filter the harsh light..
Link to comment
I for one think Susan Durby is fictitious. Rating this 7/7 and I noticed she's only rated female nudes and all 7/7's! No images of her own uploaded either! Wouldn't surprise me if some of these quote-unquote critics were totally fictitious double ended dildo's trying to pleasure their own egos with ratings.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...