andreas marx 0 Posted April 30, 2010 This was done on location with only natural light Link to comment
jerrymat 5 Posted April 30, 2010 I am sorry to have to say this but this is not a low-key image but is underexposed by almost 3 stops. There is a difference. A low key image has the majority of its tones in the darker shades but does have some in the brighter ones. Look at the histogram of this image in Photoshop and you will see that there are no pixels on the right side. Jerry Matchett Link to comment
andreas marx 0 Posted May 1, 2010 and many thanks for the honest critic - no need to feel sorry. What you also see in the punched up version is that it becomes simply blown out.... I also tend to disagree that a low key needs to have highlights... doesm't it also depend on the scene? Link to comment
wmc718 3 Posted May 1, 2010 Well, for me personally Andreas, leaving an image underexposed such as this one (and I've done it too!) leaves me feeling as though it is milky and cloudy... just begging for some contrast and brightness.Once brought to an acceptable curve however, one could always go in with some burning and dodging to improve any specific areas. I guess the bottom line is, you're the photographer, and if this presentation is what you envisioned, the first person you have to please is yourself. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now