palmi 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Excellent photo, I really like it. The colors are very nice and the position of the moon, good work. Link to comment
andreas_volmer 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Very compelling. Good, simple composition. Even the fact that the moon is centered doesn't hurt because of the diagonals below. Link to comment
atle.g 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Very nice photo!! Wonderful tonality and mood. The Placement and size of the right footprint nerutralize the centered moon, making this composition strong!! Link to comment
kristian_s_oslash_rensen 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Moving and thought provoking!The only flaw I can see is the pentagon shaped moon, which is a bit distracting. You will have to find a lens with a more pleasing rendation of out of focus highlights to avoid this problem. Link to comment
peter_daalder 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Allan, if you walked here before you took this shot, it means that anyone following in your footsteps will have very big shoes to fill! English expressions meaning that you are posting fantastic work... ;-) Link to comment
j_c 0 Posted January 3, 2003 If a shot deserves high marks for originality this one does. It is original. very nice image which lets the mind wonder what the tracks are all about. great shot ! Link to comment
scott bulger 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Beautiful shot Allan. Nice composition and thought in this one. How did you illuminate the foreground? The shadows in the footprint suggest a light source coming from your point of view, so it couldn't be the moon....could it? Don't get me wrong, I really like it, I'm just curious. Link to comment
allan wallberg 0 Posted January 4, 2003 Thanks all for nice comments I"m glad you liked my image,,,best regards from Allan. Link to comment
allan wallberg 0 Posted January 4, 2003 your eyes are right, there was an extra source of light coming fromthe left side, a lamp sitting on our small cottage in the forrest.I am glad you liked my image, best regards from Allan. Link to comment
leilani_exner 0 Posted January 4, 2003 Beautiful colors and composition. My eyes keep wondering from the moon to the footsteps. Good job. Link to comment
roger_stevens 0 Posted January 4, 2003 Hello Allan, This is a nice shot. I like the way the land leads the eye towards the moon. Though the moon is centered in the frame, it still works well. Im guessing the foot- prints that accompany you are from your trusty dog perhaps? The only thing that bothers me in this image is the color of the snow. Is has a greenish cast. I played around with this in PS and made a black and white copy just to see how it would look. Link to comment
trevor_hopkins 0 Posted January 4, 2003 A good, atmospheric shot. I think Roger's b&w version improves on the original. My only wish is that the footprints were heading towards the moon rather than away from it. (It would be the most effective way of literally leading us into the photo!) Anyway, Allan, I envy you for having a cottage in the forest... Link to comment
samuel_clemints 0 Posted January 5, 2003 Tells a story....great for a mystery book cover Link to comment
dougityb 0 Posted January 5, 2003 Somehow the black and white version makes me want to divide the image in half, either chucking the footprints, or chucking the moon, as if it's two images, not one. The color version, to me, unifies the two very different elements. The footprints also remind me of astronaut footprints on yonder moon. Link to comment
allan wallberg 0 Posted January 5, 2003 A small step for a man. A big step for humanity. (neil Armstrong said that) Link to comment
michael_bradigan 0 Posted January 5, 2003 Hey, at 30 seconds, wouldn't the moon drag across the sky? Sorry if I'm reading your data wrong. Link to comment
peter_daalder 0 Posted January 6, 2003 Hey, at 30 seconds, wouldn't the moon drag across the sky?With a 50mm lens it is possible to capture the Moon and other celestial objects without trailing, by exposing no longer than about 12 seconds... Keep in mind that objects closer to the Celestial Pole can be exposed longer (less motion near the CP). Allan shot this on the 10th of December 2002... The actual moonphase was about 34% at that time, so don't be fooled into thinking that we are looking at a Full Moon image here. Inspecting the Large view of this shows me that there is a hint of the (overexposed) lunar crescent having moved, so Allan's exposure time is not too far out... But yes, movement *has* to occur within this amount of time! Link to comment
dougityb 0 Posted January 6, 2003 The clouds are dispersing the moon's light, concealing it's movement. The same question was addressed on this image by John Orr: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=829853 Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now