mauro_dibenedetto 0 Posted January 3, 2003 Its not appealing to me. I will not rate any other screen shots, but this one is really not appealing to me. Link to comment
eleanor_draper 0 Posted January 3, 2003 This is no different than photographing a painting. Credit belongs to the programmer. Link to comment
eldho_kuriakose 0 Posted January 6, 2003 Scenario 1: someone takes screen shots of randomly generated screen savers that he considers interesting. A programmer worked meticulously to create this apparently 4D (TIME) world projected onto a 2D screen in which random seeds create lines, shapes and colors. Scenario 2: Someone takes clips of random events, shapes, lights in aN INFINTE-D world projected onto 4D frame he/she considers interesting. God (or whatever we want to call it) worked meticulously to create this world. What is the difference? Well, in 1, the one taking the clips is not a part of the programmer's world. In scenario 2, the photographer is also part of the grand artwork of which he/she takes clips. Link to comment
idandan 0 Posted May 26, 2003 when you take a picture of a flower is it your work ? maybe it is gods creation . same thing here . when you picture a building in the after noon light coming throw the window is it your work or the work of the architect that designed the building ? to tell you the trues it doesn't bother me that much . i give the credit to the creators of the programs i use . Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now