bentes_world 0 Posted December 14, 2002 A small bird it is indeed, but a great photo it indeed is. Link to comment
gunda_busch 0 Posted December 15, 2002 It is a really beautifull picture from a sweety growing up little bird. The bird looks really closed to you. You have a very good eye for it. Nice! Make more!! Link to comment
chris_spencer2 0 Posted December 15, 2002 I think the "expression" of the bird makes up for it being bland. Wonderful! Link to comment
uwestiens 0 Posted December 15, 2002 Phantastic shot. Just 1 meter distance, what did you do to get that close? Link to comment
zcreem 1 Posted December 16, 2002 The funny thing with sparrows here in Berlin is they aren't as scared of people as elsewhere I have seen and if you are very calm and steady you can get quite close. Some will also feed from your hand if you are lucky. Link to comment
dougityb 0 Posted December 16, 2002 Fantastic shot. The leaf in the background is annoying, and I would want a little more room in front of his little beak, but the sharpness is outstanding and the soft light is picking up all the little details in his feathers. he's just a little too crowded. Link to comment
scott bulger 0 Posted December 16, 2002 Very sharp and detailed. Maybe a little tight. Link to comment
fred_j._lord 0 Posted December 16, 2002 This is a wonderful image of a common little bird at its finest. The pose is truly great! The cropping is perfect to me. The fluffed out feathers make me think it might have been a bit chilly. Bravo. Link to comment
zcreem 1 Posted December 17, 2002 Thanks for the comments, to answer some of them I have another form the shoot here Small Bird View Two Link to comment
jimvanson 0 Posted December 19, 2002 Mark...this is *everything* a portrait --pardon me-- a bird shot should be. It's sharp, well lit, alive, perfect in fact. Anyone who shoots portraits --pardon me again-- birds strives to take at least one shot this good in their life. Link to comment
think27 0 Posted December 19, 2002 No question. A superb bird image. Thumbnail does not do it justice. Once I clicked on this and saw the detail, the lighting etc.. I appreciated it's perfection in this genre. Easily could be in one of those upscale bird - coffee table books.. Well done. Link to comment
jkadash 0 Posted December 20, 2002 You made this common little bird look regal! Beautiful shot! Link to comment
p_b_ 0 Posted December 21, 2002 It definitely has a digital color look. I knewit was digital right away. Link to comment
zcreem 1 Posted January 10, 2003 It looks digital what do you mean it is digtal it is on a computer display what else could it be. It is light digitised to discrete levels that can be represented on a computer monitor using light.All images on a computer are digtal (Like CDs). So wether it is digitised in the camera or in the scanner it doesn't alter much except when it gets digitised.As for colour perception and all that bull film has a wider gamaut than in is posibble to digitise but still not as wide as light itself. The funny thing is most emulsion film over saturates colour or colours so much they in no way look real, digital cameras (good ones) do not over saturate to the same amount and tend to represent colour more effectivley. When one alters an image digitaly i.e. with ProtoStrop some folks on this site go ape. Funny that they are happy when Fugi or Kodac (names changed to protect the innocent) do it its "natural" well it is not! So yes it is digital; taken with a digital camera and displayed by a digital device. Its not like I am trying to forge anything here its only a picture of a sparrow not a painting by Monet.Maybe you would like to comment on the picture not the technology involved in plonking it in your face :) Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now