blago 0 Posted November 6, 2002 And only a headache after the party, and no fun anymore. Blago Link to comment
bart 1 Posted November 6, 2002 again : who is this Clifford thing? What is this? a joke? Why are so many of you giving out 7/7?????????? Link to comment
mg 0 Posted November 6, 2002 I think I found another fantastic dog shot... Of course, maybe not as fantastic as Clifford, BUT... a serious competitor... and it was sleeping with 0 ratings when I saw it !Here it is...:http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1102877Isn't it worth a little rating too ?Cheers Link to comment
jason neymeyer 0 Posted November 6, 2002 I see that Clifford has been working as a muse since the 19th Century. In this long lost work, you can see that Clifford was the original model for Edvard Munch, as Steve Patterson alluded to earlier. Clifford is an inspiration to us all. Link to comment
bart 1 Posted November 6, 2002 I asked this twice already. Why is nobody explaing this to me? Again : who is this Clifford thing? What is this? a joke? Why are so many of you giving out 7/7???? Link to comment
mike_scott2 0 Posted November 6, 2002 Yawn- Another derivative work executed by some wanna-be placing his equipment in the tripod holes of the masters. Dont you recall Ansel Adams Lassie on the Road to Santa Fe or William Henry Jacksons Rin Tin Tin Hits the Trail or perhaps even Henry Fox Talbots Scamp on a Gravel Path? More recently weve seen William Wegmans Man Ray Riding a Unicycle on Ventura Blvd. and dont forget James Nachtweys Refugee Poodle. I do admire the display of photographic ability. Clifford is technically exquisite and a visual feast, but its been done before. Link to comment
joseph_davidchik1 0 Posted November 6, 2002 I think this image has set the tone for photographic style for the next 10 years...Also, it is just breath taking his influence in art history Link to comment
bart 1 Posted November 6, 2002 Konrad Brzozowski, nope I don't know the little fellow. Never seen him, must be something American. But what's the big deal? Link to comment
christian deichert 1 Posted November 6, 2002 It saddens me that some of the fine photo.net members who have posted to this thread (such as the illustrious "Bart.") cannot appreciate the masterful image that graces this page. I am moved almost to speechlessness, yet fortunately I can still hunt and peck out my sentiments to share in the wondrous delight of so many before me. I only wish that I had stumbled upon this divine majesty before today. I feel as if my existence up to this point has been a sham, a hollow shell which only now has been filled with life. Allow me to tender my own tribute to this image, this perfect image that delights me whenever I close my eyes and seek the meaning of life and all existence. Link to comment
sammm 0 Posted November 6, 2002 For Bart and all those who want to do more research on Clifford, try http://pbskids.org/clifford/ Link to comment
raf_tersin 0 Posted November 7, 2002 Just a warning to Clifford n friends .- Apparently Clifford is not welcome in downtown London Ont.- as captured in this photo by Bert Denda. Link to comment
seven 0 Posted November 7, 2002 It's a go at the current rating system in the process of overhaul. We want rate-weighting so that those running averages of 11/14 plus (ironically many slow-wits here participating, and rather fervently) don't have their endless 7/7s awarded to friends count as 7/7s. For many this is simply a tic pic. Not that it isn't quite brilliant of course. Link to comment
ariel_lopez 0 Posted November 7, 2002 You morons are getting too bogged down in the subject, and are ignoring the obvious symbolism of the piece. CLEARLY, this is a comment about modern communist regimes trying to move forward into a new era, while looking back on the triumphs and mistakes of the past. Sheer Brilliance. 7/7 no question. Link to comment
abintraphoto 0 Posted November 7, 2002 The Patients have taken over the asylum John !! ..................... (-; Link to comment
seven 0 Posted November 7, 2002 I reckon this was taken 12h05 your time. Settings iso 125, digital FL 5.8mm @ 1/588 seconds. Why 1/588 secs ? I asked myself; no answer - clearly the touch and logic of a master. Link to comment
rick vincent 1 Posted November 7, 2002 Did you meter for the dashboard...Amazing the detail in the shadows...How did you ever get such detail in the shadows without blowing out the highlights...this must have been a dodging and burning nightmare. You pulled it off so well. Don't you think so Bart? Don't you see the brilliance? Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted November 7, 2002 I have one question: Who... who ... WHO LET THE DOG OUT?!! Link to comment
cakeller98 0 Posted November 7, 2002 dodging and burning??? maybe doggin' and chillin' Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now