ecarter 0 Posted October 10, 2002 I think that a lower angle, showing the whole boy under the bridge would have worked out better... Link to comment
michael_mandel 0 Posted October 10, 2002 In order to achieve the lower angle, I would have had to step into the stream and get my feet wet. Some sacrifices I am not willing to make Link to comment
dennismk 0 Posted November 23, 2002 Very flat lighting, no point of interest, very poor composition. Just a bad snap shot. Link to comment
dennismk 0 Posted November 23, 2002 Very sorry for my rather quick rude comments! Was in a negitive space last night! And I almost never rate any thing when feeling like that! I should know better. When leaving comments I try to make them constuctive ones and done in a polite way even if I think the images is not very good. Please forgive my rudeness sir. I could delete the whole thing but I think I will let it stand to remind myself and others to try and be more polite. The image needs to be tighter the trees above the bridge add nothing to the frame but make it more confussing(can not spell well, never could;-)) the grass area is to bright and washed out and I can not tell what that is under the bridge. It needs more work in PS or doging and burning and croping in the trad. Darkroom. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now