JamieK 1 Posted August 29, 2008 is it film? it looks like it blows out a little. it could be really stunning if it's film and you could bring up the bottom a bit while gentling down the highlights. Link to comment
dave holmes 0 Posted August 29, 2008 Thanks for the comment and generous rating. It's digital. It was the classic back lit exposure conundrum, and this time the "expose for detail in the shadows" won out. If I bring down the highlights anymore it looks artificial. yep, film would have been better, or at least maybe I should have bracketed or been more careful! Link to comment
dougbrill 0 Posted August 29, 2008 Very well composed. Good B&W but the path is too blown out. I know this is very difficult to maintain when shhotig from the shade. Nice image anyway. Link to comment
dave holmes 0 Posted August 29, 2008 Hi Douglas. Thanks for understanding. See my comment, above. Link to comment
dougbrill 0 Posted August 29, 2008 Hi Dave, Two shots digitally combined would have done the trick too if you like PS work. Link to comment
JamieK 1 Posted August 30, 2008 there's a real trick to letting things blow out gracefully. i think it's done pretty well here. i have never combined images in photoshop, and i don't think that ever looks very natural or good, but i do bracket religiously and then work a lot with curves. Link to comment
dave holmes 0 Posted August 30, 2008 Have fun with it if you want. You can use this image, and meantime I will e-mail the original to you. If you can return your completed psd, and tell me what you did, that would be great. You have a real knack with PS and I want to learn all I can! One thing I notice that with B&W film that latitude is so great I could just carry around an ambient light meter, set the camera, and shoot away. Not quite that way with digital although I feel pretty good about the results I've been getting on the whole. Am going to have to start shooting RAW at the very least. Thanks Dave Link to comment
JamieK 1 Posted August 30, 2008 before i could shoot raw, i noticed that being off of the correct exposure by 1/3 of a stop made the image unacceptable, and that there was sometimes no acceptable exposure. that really impressed me because i used to shoot 2 1/4 without any meter at all. i just used my intuition. the pictures were always fine. film is good. raw closes the gap to some degree, at least. Link to comment
dave holmes 0 Posted September 1, 2008 I definitely need to shoot raw then, the camera is capable of it. I have my hands full, new camera + learning more about photoshop + raw. Link to comment
JamieK 1 Posted September 1, 2008 1. Curves with a single point at (155,95). This step softens the clipping edge. 2. Convert to b/w with blue filter ("Image" -> "Adjustments" -> "Black & White"). This darkens the trees. I think I like it better. What do you think? Link to comment
dave holmes 0 Posted September 1, 2008 Yes, it is better. It's a noticeable difference. I will try to reproduce your results here. Thanks for taking the time with this! God there's a lot of tricks in photoshop. Dave Link to comment
dougbrill 0 Posted September 1, 2008 Dave, Will you send the file to me to and give me a shot? It's not a competition, I am just curious to see what I can do with this exposure. Link to comment
deb1 0 Posted September 4, 2008 Dave I love how this image invites me to walk down it's pathway and explore what lies ahead. Great angle and very intriguing light. deb Link to comment
dave holmes 0 Posted September 4, 2008 Thanks very much Deb. A portfolio of shots that 'invite one to explore' is an idea I'm working on! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now