dotbob 0 Posted September 17, 2002 Nicely done. Strong composition. The coloring is effective. Link to comment
peter_daalder 0 Posted September 20, 2002 I'm always looking around for nice reflections, but in this case it is definitely the colours that drew my attention. Great image! Link to comment
httpwww.cynthia pegolo. 0 Posted September 20, 2002 I can't say other that perfect ! this is an incredible shot ! Link to comment
walter_strong2 0 Posted September 20, 2002 If you didn't work this over in PS I'd call it a 5 star image. Link to comment
george_georgantas 0 Posted September 20, 2002 Yes, I PS it heavily. Curves, layers, blend modes etc. However it is the "original" shot, not a photo-montage. Link to comment
sergei_pechersky 0 Posted September 21, 2002 I think it doesn't really matter whether one applies a bit of PS or not to its images. If the image strikes people, then it deserves to be rewarded. It's all about fine art, folks. Your photo is great, George. You've done a good job both as a photographer and as an artist. Congrats. Link to comment
juergen_kollmorgen 0 Posted September 22, 2002 I like the almost sepia tones and the mood in this shot. The composition with half sky half water works very well here. Link to comment
rena tsiflidou 0 Posted September 22, 2002 PS or no PS...this image is very good. I like the composition and the quasi sepia tone...Congrats! Link to comment
mg 0 Posted September 25, 2002 I'm sorry, but I fail to see the magic of this image. The composition is reasonably ok, though I would disagree with Juergen here, meaning that the half sky composition isn't warranted here given the poor level of detail in the top part of the image. I also find the first boat too central in the frame.Now, about the colors. This makes me want to see the original, really. I could certainly like a shif it hue on this picture, but as it is, it's all very muddy to me. As a result, no detail and contrast in both the water and the sky. Add to this that what gets emphasized here is the boats - which is fine - and the land - which is to me the least interesting part of this image.Conclusion: I could have liked the original quite a bit, I could have liked a PS version that would keep clarity, detail, and contrast in waters and the sky, but I really don't like this image as it is. Sorry for that, but that's just one man's honest opinion. Best regards. Link to comment
sjmurray 34,180 Posted October 4, 2002 I agree with Marc above. It has composition, of course, but it is too balanced in my book. To me there is not enough visual tension to be really interesting. It is a technically competent image. I find the artist's choice of making the clouds and mountains grey more distracting than not and I wish there was more real color. Link to comment
dougityb 0 Posted October 23, 2002 George has a great shot here, but not the best print possible, I don't think. I agree with Marc that this image has more potential that actual value and agree with his assessment in just about every respect, except that the middle placement of the first boat doesn't bother me. I see the string of boats, all 5 of them, as one subject, and so their placement in that respect is not troublesome to me. The horizon across the middle also doesn't bother me because it reinforces the peacefulness of the still water and the silent boats and land. The under-burned corners on the left bother me more than anything and I think burning them about 30-50% would make a big improvement. Also, I think the overall impact of the image is lost in the abundance of middle gray to light gray tones. The Photoshop default sepia tone, which is a supplied command in the Actions Palate, is, in my opinion, not very attractive. I used it on my End of September series, the first 15 or so images, and I don't like it: Too yellow. For that matter, I don't think sepia tone really looks so good on this subject. It's mostly water and sky, two subjects that rarely appeal to me in brown. The boats and the land look good in this brown, very good in fact, but not, in my opinion, the water and the sky. The composition, overall, is strong, I think, and the mood is very nice. I've posted some alternative images, all of them chemically possible. The middle image is the most like the original and, I think, maintains more closely the mood of the original. The other alternatives affect the mood somewhat and are basically different pictures, like adding more spice to a recipe. There's a technique where you can use rubber cement to paint over the part of the image that you don't want to tone, and then you tone the print as you normally would. After treatment in the chemicals you can remove the rubber cement and you have a two-tone image. The part under the rubber cement is black and white, the rest is sepia. Doing this in a sink is probably acceptable to most of the membership here, but doing it in digitally is evil, to some. The effect can be corny, but is as often as not, attractive. Link to comment
george_georgantas 0 Posted October 24, 2002 To my eye 1/2 composition (half water, half land or sky) works best for reflections than 1/3. Thats why I tend to shoot all similar subjects in balanced composition. Of course others might disagree. Doug, your versions of my image have blown me away. Im going to start playing with my photo all over again. Unfortunately I dont have access to a chemical darkroom; its going to be digitally. As a matter of fact the low contrast and the nearly orange hue was applied in the picture because I wanted to print it in my inkjet which doesnt handle highly contrasty B/W images very well. Thanks everybody for your comments. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now