cakeller98 0 Posted August 27, 2002 A little soft on the focus, I know, but I loved the depth of the iris. A little hot on the skin, but wanted to get the depth in the iris. Link to comment
v. bice 0 Posted August 27, 2002 This edit might work? Do a soft focus filter on this photo then over lay that photo with strong clear view photo - with the original> then erase the skin areas from around the eye to reveal only the soft focus area and leave the strong clear portion of the eye. In this original view the eye is not as prominet as the skin around the eye is....this is not the look you seem to be wanting us to notice...it's the eye, right. This lighting is not the best for the eye nor the SKIN..... find another source or direction for the light. Cut a panty hose up, cover the lens...leave a whole in the center...could give you the soft focus on the skin and center the eye?? btw ... very nice eyes! Link to comment
cakeller98 0 Posted August 28, 2002 ...I see what you mean. Once again, I didn't see it bacause, I'm too close ;) I asked the model what she thought, and she said "you know what the first thing I noticed was?" I said the iris??? and she said... "nope, the wrinkles under the eye" I didn't even notice, maybe because that's not a wrinkle to a guy ;) but I see it now. As for the lighting, Almost all of my pictures are with available lighting. This was taken in an airplane, so what could I do (with stuff I have, to make the lighting work better for the skin and/or eye) I took your comments and have attached a modified version I did. I cropped down on it to get rid of the unwanted portion of the skin, rather than blur it out. I tried the soft focus but it ended up looking too fudged for my taste, kind of looked like faked DOF. Link to comment
v. bice 0 Posted August 28, 2002 Use of defused light filter or indirect bounced light - hand held or clipped on a stands are my first two suggestions - many different types of materials could do this job. Or -break the bank and purchase studio lights or- make your own light set from lighting from a hardware store. Many sources on homemade equipment on the net. Here is an EXCELLENT beginning website on LIGHTING to start your reading with "Beginner's Depression" http://www.lightingmagic.com/beginq&a.htm (P.S. - WORDS to LIVE BY> don't forget> girls/women/ladies all want PERFECT SKIN - and use of digital with photography can give us this look - WHY else would the makeup industry be making millions of dollars?) Link to comment
v. bice 0 Posted August 28, 2002 C.K. you would not believe that the (skin issue) is top question that the young girls & teen boys have to ask us over the phonebefore they even set their appointment. Link to comment
wendy_woods 0 Posted August 28, 2002 Once again Verna has taken a shot with potential and turned it into something far more exciting. That wide-screen look really enhances this picture, eliminating the bumpy skin under the eyes and above, allowing the real star of the show - that eyeball - to take center stage. Link to comment
cakeller98 0 Posted August 28, 2002 ...some of it was her suggestion, but the image is my manipulation. :) I do give her credit for pointing out what some percieve as imperfections, and what might be distracting to many viewers. Thanks ;) Link to comment
mark newcombe www.mcnphoto 0 Posted August 28, 2002 Hi Christopher, First thing I noticed was the iris aswell but after reading the comments the second post with the tighter crop is so much better, this is now a great shot. Sharper eye lash's would just make it sing. Cheers Mark Link to comment
scott bulger 0 Posted August 28, 2002 Chris, You shot this under VERY difficult conditions and came away with something worth keeping. My major pick with this image is the dark triangle shadow that goes into the corner of her eye almost cutting this into two seperate images. I like the smoky feel to her hair, but I just wish there was something connecting it to her head. Very good though, and your rework is even better. Link to comment
tom_permutt 0 Posted August 29, 2002 Is that hair? I thought it was a curtain. Anyway, I also find it distracting. This is partly because of the disconnection (I see now that Scott has pointed it out), but also partly because it is blurry. Oddly, I think the DOF trick works backward here: amid all this macrographic precision, it claims unwanted attention _because_ it is blurry. Call them "wrinkles" or not, this is a picture of skin for me, too. The editing helps. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now