billangel 9,671 Posted January 3, 2001 The image is well composed and exposed overall. The canyon opening at the top of the image, which is in bright sunlight is, however, overexposed and hence "washed out" in terms of tonal range and image detail. One way to overcome this situation is to make two exposures; the excellent one that you made, and a second exposure of much shorter time to capture the detail and tonal range of the canyon opening. These two photos could then be combined via a digital image editor to eliminate the two areas (canyon opening and the patch of the canyon floor being struck by direct sunlight) that were of necessity overexposed in the original photo. Link to comment
jawed_ashraf 0 Posted January 10, 2001 Bill, I'm astonished by your comments. The "washed out" portions of the image add to the unreality of the result and intensify the feeling that the rock is a fire, fossilized. Link to comment
ericx 0 Posted February 15, 2001 Yeah, this is a great shot. The bright sky gives way to the ray witch gives way to the bright spot. If either the sky or the spot was changed it would look out of place. If this was my picture i would leave it like it is and be happy. Link to comment
noahbryant 0 Posted March 7, 2001 I agree the rays look a little too good, and I also thing the wshed out part adds to the pic too, Reall good photo. Link to comment
triblett_lungre_thurd 0 Posted March 13, 2001 aesthetics/technique a solid 8/10 originality ...-3 Link to comment
doc mason 0 Posted March 23, 2001 I agree completely. The light tones are exceptional. The variations of sharpness of the light in certain areas adds to the overall compositon of the photo. Please don't touch this photo at all Link to comment
idandan 0 Posted April 16, 2001 it looks as if it was taken in the Red canyon next to Eilat Israel . anyway it is just beautiful 10/10 Link to comment
stephen_f 0 Posted May 26, 2001 I think this picture is fantastic. I think Mr. Bill Angel is jealous, because there is either a good picture, or a picture that just sucks, and this is a good picture, and when somebody trys to say how you can re invent it, or improves small aspects, is either jealous, or just somebody who looks for mistakes. Great Job! Link to comment
harv 0 Posted June 30, 2001 I wish I could take pictures this good. And knowing it hasn't been "digitally edited" only adds to the magic. Leave the digital editing in Hollywood! Link to comment
peterj 0 Posted July 2, 2001 Excellent shot! Very good detail. In rating this photo, I gave you a 5 in originality however as I've seen this shot many times. Overall, excellent... Link to comment
bliorg 9 Posted August 23, 2001 Yeah, Bill - you're right. But what this really needs is a waterfall. What shoulda been done is to combine this, and a good, foggy, moody shot of Tower Falls in Photoshop. Then it'd been a great picture, right? Link to comment
matteo-delgrosso 0 Posted August 31, 2001 This is a very popular place and there are quite a few photos around. This is a very nice one. It really looks like Scotty's beamer. Link to comment
leif_rudd 0 Posted September 23, 2001 The shaft of light turns this from an impressive shot into an amazing one. I wouldn't change a thing about it, and would be rightfully giddy if I had produced this image. Great job! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now