tjallen 0 Posted August 22, 2002 I really like most of your work, it's mostly tastefull and artistic. I think this one will offend a lot of people though. Link to comment
maris 0 Posted August 28, 2002 maybe little bit bordering on porn, but this was not my goal. I do not shoot commercial photos for magazines or web but do pictures only for my (and models) pleasure Link to comment
jeremy_edmunds 0 Posted August 28, 2002 People might be offended that the image is so small... Link to comment
John Peri 1,038 Posted August 28, 2002 There is nothing vulgar about this photo. It's nicely taken from an original perspective. Link to comment
alan cuellar 0 Posted September 9, 2002 I am really impress of your work, and your approach to this kind of photography wich I agree that is far away from porno. Keep up. :=) Link to comment
studio5nine 0 Posted October 22, 2002 If you believe it's art then it's art..... at least that's what I try to sell my my wife on.If the photo evokes thoughts of ......... well I'm not going to go into it (no pun intended), but I think it needs some artistic touching up. Link to comment
victor wood 0 Posted January 24, 2003 If this is porn, then I guess all nudes are, egal if its a modern photo or an ancient statue. Maybe what upsets (some) are the spread legs, which look a bit un-natural. I would have prefered closed crossed legs, as it would be a bit more realistic, but then, is it realistic that someone happens to be standing nude in a ruin! Its art, and good art. Keep it up! (no pun intended) Link to comment
detlef 6 Posted November 17, 2004 tastefull and erotic...certainly not porn....good use of setting and pose to create tention Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now