It's all about the exposure! (What do you think?)

Exposure is good.

I want to get my dodge tool out and highlight some of the areas between the horizontal lights going up the tower. Wire distracts too and photo might benefit from its removal.

D1X seems to do a great job. I wanted one but kept my F5 and Leica M6 instead and settled for a Olympus E10.

...here's the critique I requested :) Architexture... What do you think of the exposure?

I'm interested to know what you think about the exposure. The fog had rolled in around an hour before sunset, so there was lot of diffuse light, and it was very blue/gray. This image looks almost exactly like the scene did. I'm curious, does the exposure seem appropriate or under/over, without the knowledge that it looks fairly true to life? and does the exposure seem appropriate with that knowledge. Also, does anyone knows a way to effectively decrease the contrast in a scene with a filter or other method, such as stopping down, or opening up? Basically if your shadows are in zone I or II and your highlights are in zone VIII... since photographic processes cannot reproduce this high a "range" of values, does that just mean you have to give one of them [highlights or shadows] up? Has anyone tried using some kind of HDRI Program (high dynamic-range imaging, taking multiple exposures of the same scene, and combining them to get a wider range of values) and then made prints from the resulting image? Would it matter if you had all the information for the different values in the scene. OK with all that said... I'm open to any contructive criticism. Thanks for your time.