fred_j._lord 0 Posted August 9, 2002 Tell me, is this three or four images combined? It's a very interesting assembly. The colors are very nice. Switching the mountains to the east is something I had to do for a job in Denver once. It actually worked quite well. Link to comment
etesla 0 Posted August 11, 2002 I'd love to see the original--the editing is a bit heavy-handed. Link to comment
bobby douglas 0 Posted August 27, 2002 Ok a lot colorcorected This was actually 4 shots put together. Link to comment
gl5 0 Posted September 2, 2002 this image is a tad too much in in the realm of digital manipulation for me. the over-coloring digital manipulation actually detracts from the image which in my opinion, it should never do. digital manipulations should never call attention to itself, in fact, if done well, it should go un-noticed. Link to comment
bobby douglas 0 Posted September 10, 2002 If it is it shure looks like fun. No that's actually Elich Gardens Amusement Park. Link to comment
miguelangelhoyas 0 Posted September 19, 2002 Even been too artificial, colors works good on this shot, but I think it would be better if you eliminate the lower part of the shot (the reflection), cropping to the shoreline obtaining an interesting panorama, the reflects are too distracting. Link to comment
bobby douglas 0 Posted September 19, 2002 Maybe that would work but then I would lose the kayaker and the ripples in the water from him and besides I have way to many Panoramas already, This was just an attempt at something different. Thank you for the advice though. Link to comment
mg 0 Posted September 27, 2002 I'm unable to figure out what the purpose of this may have been. It is quite well done, and the colors strike, but once the first color impact is over, there's nothing left for me. Mostly NO REASON WHY these effects took place, no mood, and NO FEELINGS behind them. Just an honest opinion that would go with the following advice: make sure your effects actually MEAN something and ACHIEVE SOMETHING more than just color impact. Regards. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted August 29, 2004 so I am only 2 years late to this. Elichs! I havent heard/read that name is so long. You are very bad im a wonderful context. Knicki Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now