Untitled

... Tailender comments ... not tailender photographers .. what ever they are. I guess you know.

Juha, enough of this nonsense, surely. Tailender comments are made by tailender people and you have referred to them in the past as the "tailender group". Do you want the reference? These are members of PN and you are insulting them. Now do understand when enough is enough, you are just sinking deeper into the mire.

 

If I may add also, do learn to live and let live, and to keep your prejudices to yourself. I do not write personal comments under your photos, I do not write about you under other people's photos, and I do not begin threads regarding you and your approach to your work on the comments pages of PN. Finally, I do not invent words using your family name attached to the word -porn that I then plaster all over this site. This is outrageous and slanderous, and I shall see whether it is worthy of further investigation.

 

The education that you so proudly refer to on your front page is not a privilege, it is a duty. Try to learn how to behave like a gentleman.

 

 

 

"Physician, heal thyself" You advise us that the best course of action is to ignore these kinds of comments; and, to a large extent, I think we have learned to do so.

 

It just seems to me that you are feeding him. Do you remember, "Don't feed it and maybe it will go away"?

John, you are getting agitated from my words for no reason. With tailender comments (or group) I refer to your regular fan-club. You know it perfectly well that there is a group of people who follow your photos. If you look at the statistics you'll find out that your viewer rates your photos 4.7 times by average where as typical figure is less than 2. I am not saying it is a ring. It can well be a group of people with similar genre preferences. You know what I mean. Same way you rate the same photographers appr. 6 times which is very high figure at PN. You also have a very high average given ratings (5.58/5.59) - interestingly quite a bit higher than that you have received (5.27/5.16). Again. i am only stating statistical data which can be found here by anybody.

Please, John, don't get agitated, but I am not here to please. I am here to give honest critique - both positive and negative. My given ratings statistics follow a very nice bell-curve and I constantly monitor it.

I am over out now. I didn't mean to come to critique your shots anymore, but the theme was so important this time. In one thing we see eye to eye and that is that depression is a severe problem.

"Peri-Porn" is not critique. It is an intolerable insult and judicially it may constitute slander.

 

I have collected the threads and I am looking into it. Now in the meantime, please go away.

very erotic charge in this image. very distant from porn in my opinion.