stembaughphotography 0 Posted September 9, 2007 Wow! The colors are really dramatic here! Link to comment
steve_rasmussen 312 Posted September 10, 2007 There is not a big following for work like this, where one turns the natural world into the unatural. There is a reason why it is not published much either. I don't like it at all. Link to comment
ellis_vener_photography 9 Posted September 10, 2007 skykedelic! (Yes I do know how to spell psychedelic). Reminds me of some of the radically rendered and processed landscapes in Kubrick's version of "2001: A Space Odyssey." Link to comment
petemillis 0 Posted September 10, 2007 This type of image is also not my sort of thing, but I know there are people who appreciate images like this. What does intrigue me, though, is whether you set out to take this as a photograph in itself and then decided to work it in PS (or whatever), or rather as a piece of raw material with the intention of heavilly processing it. I tend to look at a scene I'm photographing as it it, rather than as something that I would like to process. I sometime play with pictures I have already taken to see what I can do with them in terms of processing, and do get some "interesting" results. What I'm trying to ask is, do you visualise the processed image before the photograph is taken? Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now