Jump to content

Sunrise over Eagle Lake


dave.englund

Exposure Time 2.5s (25/10)Aperture f/22.0ISO 100Focal Length 23mm (guess: 25mm in 35mm)Photo Dimensions 3504 x 2336
Used nic Color Efex Graduated Orange to warm the sky.


From the category:

Landscape

· 290,473 images
  • 290,473 images
  • 1,000,012 image comments


Recommended Comments

Really nice exposure in the foreground. The sky is almost blown, and I think it would have benefited this image if the sunburst were sharper. Have you tried exposure blending?
Link to comment
"Exposure blending" - I assume your talking about AE bracketing and then later blending for the best overall look. Never done it. Guess I'm gonna have to jot down another ToDo on my 3x5 receipe card for Landscapes; "set auto bracketing - On." Sounds like a fun learning opportunity.
Link to comment

Dave, actually if you shoot RAW, there's no need to bracket. What I mean by exposure blending is mounting your camera on a tripod, shooting in manual mode, keeping the same aperture and choosing differnt shutter speeds. Of course this will give you differnt exposures. You pick a shot you like that has good exposure in the sky (it will be dark in the foreground) and you pick another shot that has a good exposure in the foreground (overexposed in the sky) and you blend them to achieve a good overall exposure. You can eactually do this with several shots, not just two. Here's a few examples of some images I got from exposure blending:

2 shots blended

 

5 shots blended

Link to comment
Will, those are great images. Awesome composition. Amazing colors. Do you know how I would do the blend through Photoshop Elements?
Link to comment
It definately has layers. It just doesn't have all the functionality as Photoshop. But there is usually a way (albetit longer) to accomplish the same thing in Elements. I'll do some more research online. Thanks.
Link to comment
Very nice composiiton and colors, completely different atmosphere as compared to the foggy shot. Will is right with his comment about bracketing, I do this almost everytime when I have my tripod with me. Just curious: why f:22 ? AFAIK, each lens is prone to diffraction when stopped down so far.
Link to comment

Why f/22? Ah, well Carsten...let's just say I'm still pretty much a newbie when it comes to serious landscape photography;-) This shot was one of several I took at a local area lake (about six blocks from my house) where I was practicing with hyperfocal focusing. Actually, after taking a critical look at the shot I embarked on some rather serious research that led to this post over at the Luminous Landscape discussion forum (my most disciplined experiment with hyperfocal focusing can be seen in this post). All of that is to say, you're right, f/22 is less than steller, I know that now;-)

 

Still, this image turned out pretty good for one of my first serious attempts. I also had some success with applying a nic Efex warming filter to the shot. In the original the sky was blown out. I applied a graduated orange filter to the image overall, with most of the emphasis on the blown out sky. So, I am learning there are two parts to this creative process - what we do in the field with camera in hand, and what we do at the PC with mouse in hand;-)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...