re_photography 0 Posted February 18, 2007 I'll agree with the previous comment insomuch as I am somewhat bothered by the cropping of this photo. This cropping, which is neither really close on the eye, nor wide enough to show the shape of the head, is awkward. This middle of the line cropping combined with a lack of contrast/tonal range give the photo a flat, nondimensional feel to it. There needs to be more depth leant to the subject either by the above-mentioned methods alone, or perhaps combined with a slight change of perspective, especially since the eye, which is the apparent subject of the photo is quite obscured by the lashes. Link to comment
aztlan5593 0 Posted February 18, 2007 Thank you both for your comments. It will definetly help me in the future. However I did not crop this photo. I took a series of closeup of the subject, kind of like a jiggsaw puzzle.I had no problem getting this close since she is my pet donkey that I use to guard my goats and sheep.Cheers, Tony. Link to comment
re_photography 0 Posted February 18, 2007 Just a word of clarification, I may have used the term "crop" to refer to the amount/area of the subject/scene which is shown in the photograph when "frame" might have been a more correct term, as I have no way of knowing whether the image shown is the full extent of the original exposure or a cropped in area of said exposure. "Framing" I guess can be done either with the camera when originally composing the subject or afterward during the postprocessing/editing, whereas "cropping" would be specific to limiting during postprocessing/editing the displayed area of the image in relation to the original exposure. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now