silente 0 Posted January 11, 2007 Happy that my "provocation" caused this interesting discussion... Rarindra is right... Emulating her job does not have any sense to me... may be some photographer will rest in peace if Rarindra show him this shot "as the 2,5" digital camera diplay" ;) Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted January 11, 2007 oh, :) SUperb :) Bravo dear Rarindra :) Bravo Master of the Light :) Biliana Link to comment
julio_segura_carmona1 4 Posted January 11, 2007 Excelente imagen de gran belleza, magnifica luz, color, gran encuadre y una magnifica composicion, saludos cordiales Rarindra. Link to comment
silente 0 Posted January 12, 2007 It seems to me that it's quite easy to find a great light in this place in the morning... take a look of this photo of the same forest: So don't go crazy if you cannot understand how this shot can be done. My job is absolutely not the photographer, I'm a film Composer, and in music things are very similar... If the film is bad, no one will listen to his music, even if is very well done. In this case, the primary material, this forest, is awesome. ...and yes "the right place whit the wrong photographer is the same as the right photographer in the wrong place" ;) Rarindra, never think I'm degrading your ecxellent work,... only I can't stand people who say:"How?How?How?" and spend their life asking how and not "Why?"... Best regards, your fun, Emanuele E. Bossi, From Italy Link to comment
jaideep_karmakar 0 Posted January 12, 2007 I think other people fail because they have not mastered the software you are using. Lets be fair to all; why don't you load a picture that is least manipulated. That way we get to see your photography talent and your sense of utilizing light. Your compositions are excellent; having said that, I would love to see them with least manipulation. Link to comment
vancouverphotographer 1 Posted January 12, 2007 Rarindra, why? ;-) Jaideep, then the student becomes the master ;-) Link to comment
ahmed bahhodh 0 Posted January 12, 2007 Salam Rarindra, first of all, i would like to say that you've done a great and amazing work. You're talented. I found this photograph who seems to follow your way, he is also indonesian (I think so). From this, i'm asking, is there an indonesian style of photograhy ? http://janushand.multiply.com/photos/album/13 Keep up the good work, Rarindra...:) Salam. Ahmed. ps: sorry for my english ;) Link to comment
glenn norris 0 Posted January 12, 2007 I just followed Ahmed's link from above to the photographer with the same style but to me it looks like the exact same work... I am a little confused.... some of the locations are the exact locations used in Rarindra's, no mistake. Glenn Link to comment
silente 0 Posted January 12, 2007 I am astonished... It seems to me that you only need to point and shot to have a great result in this place, due to the incredible NATURAL light... Ahmed link has resolved many question... Tks! Link to comment
kerryharrison 0 Posted January 13, 2007 Rarindra, All of your images are so very magical. The atmosphere you create, the way you capture you subject, it tells a beautiful story. The images remind me of illustrations. So powerful! Lovely! I can't wait to see more. Best Regards, Kerry Link to comment
vancouverphotographer 1 Posted January 13, 2007 Emanuele, damn - let's get a small digicam and go try :) Link to comment
silente 0 Posted January 13, 2007 Since beginning of time a good photo is made 50/50 of good subject and good photographer... whatever camera you're using... ;) Link to comment
vancouverphotographer 1 Posted January 13, 2007 I agree with you Emanuelle, and I think that's why the consensus is that although Rarindra has modest equipment, she understands the art of light (though maybe not the physics since you pointed out some shadow issues) and uses that to get gorgeous photos. Link to comment
silente 0 Posted January 13, 2007 Shure... I'm a real fun of rarindra's world... Still asking me if she is a talented painter who like photography, or a talented photographer who like painting ;) Whatever, the job is astonishing... in some case I would like to see a bit more respect of physic, but is real important in the world of art and creation... may be not :) Link to comment
vancouverphotographer 1 Posted January 14, 2007 Emanuele, we probably shouldn't hijack this thread here, but I guess art is interpretive and we can look at it any way we want, as a representation of reality, a distortion of reality or something in between. But having said that, the physics of it all is probably not that important as long as we like looking at it. Link to comment
PeterKrenek 26 Posted January 16, 2007 Rarindra, I also admire your PhotoShop skills. Could you show us what the picture looked like before the use of PhotoShop ? I would be very interested how much postprocessing contributes to the final look of this image. Thank you. Peter Link to comment
silente 0 Posted January 22, 2007 Peter, i think it's a secret... Do you really think beethoven would tell you the main theme of a simphony before he finished it? ;) Link to comment
vancouverphotographer 1 Posted February 1, 2007 Emanuelle, it's not a secret - it's all in Photoshop ... the rendering light option - all you need is Rarindra's artistic know-how about where to and how to render it so it looks nice. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now