turecek 0 Posted March 29, 2008 Surely a nice and interesting place but it would be better to visit it in different day time for better light conditions. Also it seems to me that the temple building is going to the left a bit. It's also a pity that the very top of temple building is missing whilst there is a certain part of lawn downside. Link to comment
iliafarniev 13 Posted March 29, 2008 In my opinion this shot is fine. Missing top and light quolity might be seen as unusual from western photographic tradition, but IMO the image is effective, true to the classics and nature of Subcontint yet conveys the isence well. I would like to see more of this kind photography here on PN. Regards. Ilia. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now