gnashings 5 Posted September 22, 2006 Tried to go for that old, moody look. Took some printing to get it to look like this, most of which is ruined by the scan, but hey - I wanted to share. Link to comment
gromoslawpirx 0 Posted September 22, 2006 It does indeed capture that old look with grainy sky. Well done. I suggest better dust control in the darkroom. And less od this "look at me I've got the F1". Its not the camera that matteres. Link to comment
k5083 1 Posted September 22, 2006 It does capture that vintage look, and maybe the dust even helps. I confess I have never understood why people do the make-it-look-old thing with warbird pictures, but this is well done of its kind. Link to comment
j.k._york 0 Posted September 22, 2006 It does look vintage, but photos from that time (WWII) were usually shot with press view 4x5's and tended not to be very grainy at all. They did tend to be contrasty/crunchy though. I don't get the "look at me I've got the F1" comment. I don't see where you were chest beating about your camera??? I still like your shot because the P-51 is the "Cadillac" of the sky. Link to comment
gnashings 5 Posted September 22, 2006 Grom, thanks for the comments and suggestions. I am in love with my F1, the truth might as well be known :) It understands me. August,Quite honestly I agree with the "make it look like..." sentiment you hold, but sometimes I think its fun, especially with "period pieces". They almost look out of place in the clinical antiseptic museums and the like. But I have to come out with the truth: I liked the potential of this neg, but when I shot it I only had a one camera, one lens - a 50mm - on hand. It was either shoot and crop, or not get the pic. The straight print was uninteresting, so I decided to play aournd with it. Given the enlargement and the crop from a fairly grainy 35mm film... well, my options were either forget it or go for a "look". I knew the sky would have to be a part of the image or else it would be very bland and empty, and after several prints this was not the most correct, but the most interesting result I got. I wont bore you with the straight print, or the lighter version I have - I simply thought that as depictions of an airplane they were too poor and without the drmamtic sky they, frankly, lacked any merit. As to the dust, yes, its a devil and it gets in there - but I think the scanner has some spots on the glass, because not all of these are on the print. Alas, here it is - and I truly appreciate the input, thanks as always. Link to comment
duncan speirs 0 Posted September 25, 2006 Hi Peter,interesting photo,i like the composition and the feel of the picture.Nice Cheers Duncan Link to comment
jeffrey_e 0 Posted September 29, 2006 I think you captured something here, and you captured it very well indeed. And posting the technical details of how you accomplished this look is much appreciated. Well done and thanks for sharing it. Link to comment
emjordan 0 Posted October 28, 2006 A new photo from you! It was worth the wait. It has a timeless quality to it. elisabeth Link to comment
gnashings 5 Posted January 6, 2007 Thank you all for your kind words, I am truly flattered! I am glad it brought a smile to your faces, as your images so often bring to mine! Link to comment
dokordave 0 Posted September 11, 2007 First of all, thanks for stopping by my picture of the steam powered launch. I wanted to commend you on this shot. not only is the P-51 a great bird, but I can appreciate your work at trying to get the vintage feel here. It certainly works for me. Congrats on a great image. Dave in NY Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now