Dima & Natasha #1

Lovers

Very nice!

Excellent light and tones... But I really do not understand it! And however it seems a little porn like pic even I do not find anything arousing in this :))

A simple question: what`s with her face? He`s only gently kissing her ass.

Maybe he's biting her ass?

The aethetics and technical aspects are all there. As mentioned above, the facial expression on the woman takes away from it. The exorcist comes to mind. Cheers!

Maybe she had herself a big 'ol mess of pork & beans for lunch and she's about to let fly a great fart that resounded louder than a team of stallions pulling a loaded cart of concrete up a mountain side????

I'm fileing this one under "P" for porn. I guess photo.net doesn't moderate or care what is being posted.

i like it,

 

 

and steven if this is porn for you - oh poor boy

 

 

RM

Rene, well if you concider this fine art shame on you ;)

Thanks to ALL for your comments

Porn!?!? How can this be classified as porn, I wonder? That being said, I don't particulary like the picture. I think I would keep only the boy and harm in a square format. There is something happening there with the lighting, expression,and I thing this is the strongest part of the picture. I would crop a bit below his elbow and in the curve of her back.

Here we go with that 'Porn" business again! I do not see anything pornographic about this image. It is edgy and well executed.

Gerald, I'm still on the floor laughing. thank you.

She might be passing gas. Or he's using his teeth. I can't decide.

:)) good

Porn, but good tone and lighting.

She sat on a thorn; it's painful & he's extracting it using his teeth. More like first aid but don't think we have a category for that ...

I'm not sure if I would classify this as porn. A little edgy for photo.net and might even be on the fence with the site's terms of use, but not porn. When I think of porn, I think bad lighting, cheap looking image, and not artistic. This is on the contrary is a well executted photo. Not really my cup of tea when it comes to photography, but I won't disrepect it by calling it porn.

 

BTW Gerald Scott, I don't think I've ever laughed so hard reading a comment on a photo. Hilarious.

You know, I usually don't even bother looking at the nudes on Photo.net, because they are usually fairly plain, sort of, "hey look I got a nude model" type shots. This one is great, regardless of whether it is mildly pornographic, or humorous. I'm not sure which it was intended to be, but it reminds me a little of that Sci-Fi channel commercial where the guy picks up the Chihuahua and blows on its rear, inflating it into a balloon dog, which then kicks him. I'm assuming it was intended to be sexual, not comical, but that works because of the facial expression. Technically, the image is pretty good as well.

 

That said... Maybe photo.net should put the top rated nudes in a section that can be dropped by the visitor, because some places don't like you looking at naked people...

 

Also, has anyone noticed that the "top photos" section gets a glut of nudes every few days, then there are none or almost none, then a new cluster appears? Any ideas on why? I'd venture that it has something to do with weekend shooters' work and votes hitting the queue heavy and pushing the nudes down, which then abates as the week goes on. But I'm just pulling that out of my butt.

the photo is well lit, and i definately wouldn't call it porn. The photography is great, nothing to critique there, but all that said, i would still rate this shot pretty low for one reason. The look on the female models face completely ruins the shot. You can tell the guy is gently kissing her and she has a distorted nasty face going and it makes no sense at all.

This has some additional creativity to it I must admit. I love the B&W and the expression on Natasha's face (Ouch...as she concentrates on the pleasure side of it). Amusing and well executed composition...Now I want to see more of Dima! ;)

It's not a porn, by no manner of means.

However, I consider the performance of this photo isn't artistic and isn't delicate (for such theme).

It looks feigned and gives an impression of grotesque (or parody).

Porn or GAS - you decide....Next on Geraldo!

To those that are offended by this image I respect your opinion and your feelings. But please take a moment to look at the rest of this man's work. Yes he pushes the edge, he does fetish and erotic style work. But I think you would have to agree this is not low quality porn material. 1st of all no porn person would buy this its not showing anything LOL. Vlad I see your work as artistic and respect your vision.

This is so not porn, but porn is in the eye of the beholder. I think it could be better with a different expression on the woman's face.