vallery 0 Posted September 9, 2006 to "draw" texture with light! I like it. it is unique. Link to comment
uneboite 0 Posted September 10, 2006 I agree with the above comment here. The texture is more graphical, a result of the exposure time, than the actual texture of the objects shot. It gives delicate and "artistic" results (I cannot find a better word). Just for fun I've pushed it a bit on the curves, rotated the yellows towards greens and boost saturation. Hope you don't mind. Link to comment
pt2 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Vallery - I'm glad you like it. Joe - I had a lot of fun with this. Your hue changes are subtle, but noticable. I worked with this image for a while (it's the original without even levels applied) but decided I liked the delicate feel the way it is. To me, the best compliment is that you're enjoying it. Thanks. Link to comment
lucyhollis 2 Posted September 10, 2006 I like this for its different take on 'Texture' - the camera creates the texture. I like the feel alot. I prefer this version personally - it shows the most detail and colours most subtly. Link to comment
dominiquedodge 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Soft delicate feel, even if the tree was a scratchy one - so you have succeeded in creating your own mood and texture PT. Very nicely done. It looks almost like rain on a hot day. I like the colours of the original but might consider darkening the bottom edge a tiny bit. Would you be prepared to share technical details ? Link to comment
pt2 0 Posted September 12, 2006 Technical Details: The plant is a new rose bush. It came up from seed this year and is approximately 18in/50cm tall. I waited until the plant was in full sun and the background in shade. ISO 100, 24mm lens, circular polarizer, f/29, 1/8 second; hand-held. Ooops; that was for the wrong photo. ISO 100, 50mm lens, circular polarizer, f/22, 1 sec; hand held. Link to comment
robidooo 0 Posted September 12, 2006 Interesting experimentation PT. Creating texture this way is something I would not have thought about. But to be honest, I would not hang this photo. By that, I mean that I don't think it works that well as a photo outside of this theme. I guess that playing with some elements in PShop, like removing the magenta cast, and increasing contrast locally could make it better. Right now, I find it is half way between a shot taken by mistake, and a deliberated work of art. You have to make it more look like a painting I think. Link to comment
patrick flynn 0 Posted September 14, 2006 IMHO This photo is the answer to anti-texture, this is not to say that I don't like the work. It just doesn't appear "on task". Link to comment
jana 1 Posted September 15, 2006 according to me there is no themefit. I looked at the dictionary explaining the texture: xx 1. A structure of interwoven fibers or other elements. 2. The distinctive physical composition or structure of something, especially with respect to the size, shape, and arrangment of its parts: the texture of sandy soil; the texture of cooked fish. 3. The appearance and feel of a surface: the smooth texture of soap. 4. Distinctive or identifying quality or character: "an intensely meditative poet [who] conveys the religious and cultural texture of time spent in a Benedictine monastery" New York Times. 5. The quality given to a piece of art, literature, or music by the interrelationship of its elements: It shows light/colour pattern - both natural entities without the texture (they are not solid or liquid) cheers Jana Link to comment
dominiquedodge 0 Posted September 16, 2006 I'm quite happy with the theme fit (it's OK to disagree!), perhaps definition No 5) quality given to a piece of art .. by the interrelationship of its elements ? I see a visual texture - sort of like an illusion of a real texture. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now