Jump to content

From the category:

Architecture

· 102,066 images
  • 102,066 images
  • 296,366 image comments


Recommended Comments

megansteen

Posted

Comments appreciated.
azenall

Posted

I like, but I had not placed the horizon in half of the frame. Regards and continue shooting.
megansteen

Posted

Thanks for commenting Gerardo! It is appreciated, truly! Megan
jh de beer

Posted

This a beautifully pleasing image, the light was soft and full and just perfect. Somehow the idea of "3" came out again here, with the 3 structures. I would however consider some less sky above, maybe a crop of half the sky will do this photo great justice. Well done. JH
megansteen

Posted

Thanks for the comments JH!

 

Here is a cropped version.

 

--Megan

4072982.jpg
as de beer

Posted

Mmmm, so this is what happens when one alters something good? If one HAD to crop, I would say the green grass border in front should go. That would strengthen the idea of timeliness and never-ending space. But, then the effect of the TWO green borders would be lost, which now complement each other, whilst emphasising the feeling of loneliness. So why crop, JH?
jh de beer

Posted

Perfect crop :-)

 

Arnold asked: why crop? It is a justified question, and I hope I can offer a meaningful answer for the benefit of Megan.

 

I suppose the obvious reason would be to adhere to a certain extent to the "rule of thirds". In terms of this rule, you would normally place the horison at the lower third or higher third of the frame, not dead centre in the middle. I am however, the last one that swears by this rule under all circumstances.

 

The reason why I think it is appropriate in this instance, lies in the three structures. Look careful - it is actually brilliantly displayed in this image. The two sheds on the left have their entrance doors facing towards us, the one on the right not. The two doors on the sheds look like eyes, and are looking at the viewer. By cropping the sky, Megan created the feeling of the sheds as part of the setting, looking "down" at the viewer, therefore enhancing the intensity of the majestic godly light she managed to capture.

 

I hope this qualify as an attempt to an explanantion on why I would prefer a crop.

 

Regards

JH

as de beer

Posted

I still do not agree with JH (the cropped photo looks 'pressured' or 'boxed' in). But, hey, who am I to speak, I am the guy with the 3/3 snapshot pix.
megansteen

Posted

Thank-you both for the comments. I can see where you are both coming from. I guess it is just whatever your personal opinion is.

 

--Megan

tripanfal

Posted

I really like this Megan. I however agree it needs a bit of a crop. It also looks a bit soft to my eye but overall very good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...