digitalrebel 0 Posted July 10, 2006 Nice shot, beautiful model ... the eyes are ever so slightly overprocessed I'd say ... Link to comment
homem 0 Posted July 10, 2006 Ken, I just love this images. I kind of like the eyes processed extensively on these images. Link to comment
dexdee 0 Posted July 10, 2006 I don't know which one is better. I like both. Again, great eyes. DDD Link to comment
leon_schnell 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Using the same model for a number of shoots is a great idea, and I'm always interested in seeing the new ways you decide to photograph your models each time. Some of your photos of the same model are surprising though, because they are so different that they almost look like different models. Do you ever photoshop your models to look so different? I can hardly believe that the following two photos of Sunnie are purely the result of a different angle and lightingErm...it seems my two images have disappeared from my host. While I get them back up, they were crops from Sunnie02 and Sunnie06. Link to comment
kenandrews 2 Posted August 28, 2006 Thanks for the question, and for the time and effort that went into it! Actually I had not been totally happy with the way I had processed this photo. It was one of my first from the session, and when I processed the RAW file I set the contrast too high. Subsequent photos from the same shoot were lower in contrast, and were softer and subtler as a result, and the eyes more lively. I have re-done this one (see image attachment, below), and think it's better. Link to comment
homem 0 Posted August 28, 2006 Wow Ken what a difference. The revised version breathes some life into the image. Here she looks a little blauh in comparison. Link to comment
alter ego 0 Posted September 1, 2006 The revised version has some wash out in highlighted areas. However, I don't think that they have much of a negative effect. I prefer the revised one. As David said, it has more life to it, and seems to make a better conection with the viewer. Regards, A.E. Link to comment
garymeyer 0 Posted September 1, 2006 My first impression of the original posting was that the face was a bit too dark and I think the adjustments in your revision do well to correct that problem. I'd recommend a compromise, however, and not bumping up the exposure of the entire picture. I'd recommend a gradient in photoshop to hold back the exposure in the upper left quadrant. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now