Jump to content

Night shot


marc_streisand

Manual


From the category:

Architecture

· 101,989 images
  • 101,989 images
  • 296,362 image comments


Recommended Comments

When I see the shot it reminds me for some reason of a rocket about to blast off. Which is good - if that is the intent/interpetation...

or if your happy with the motion in the shot - it does give it an energy of sorts.

 

If however you were trying for a clean and tight literal night shot of the Eiffel tower then a tripod is the way to go. ;-)

 

Link to comment
Burred pictures as art are my personal pet peeve! Sorry to be harsh, but IMO blur has a very limited asthetic use -- i.e. showing movement in a rapidly moving subject. My tip: work on technical perfection first, and then start getting artsy.
Link to comment
Go get one and redo this shot. I have seen VERY few shots in which the blur adds something. This one would be great, if it wasn't for the blur. You'll see the difference.
Link to comment

Is the blur intentional or did you do it on purpose?

 

If it was intentional, I like it. Another fine grained non-blur shot of this structure would be, well, just another picture. This one adds interest and artistic qualities to a much too overly-photographed subject. There is an image in a current photo magazine of a NYC street scene taken by the former mayor. It is blurry like this. It adds interest where there was none before.

 

If you didn't mean to blur this and it's an accident, get a tripod!

Link to comment
Earthquake.... That's certainly a good idea... certainly what I had in mind when I look at the photograph. Blurring your image is nice, we can still recognize the scene and the environment. Just don't over do it.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...