Untitled

Very spooky image. Hard to figure out exactly what the context is. Too bad there is not a spot of flash on the face, just enough to bring out the features. Hard to do in what appears to be a very candid context.

HI

 

I used a flash 1 stop reduced because I like to see thad the sun is the main light.

She was dancing a very nice sequence to me, she was a very good dancer!

 

No flash illumination on her face? To me her face appears overexposed!

what fuc2222 nonsense, what trite and clishe crap. Honestly, Armin who are you kidding?

I'm all for encouraging the artistic atempt but please have the sensitivity to spare us the reverse enginering shite. For Christ's sake is anyone going to have the decency to put an end to this nonsense, this feable attempt at regurgitater other peoples work.

NO I do not have, but I do no pretend either.

And what is it with your incesant regurgitation stylistic works? Are you really in need of every large format impressionable newcomer's admiration? And these incesant notes about lens performance as if they really held any relevance to true imnage making. I am sorry for this rant, but for two years now I have been reading these absurd comments from you vis a vis lens issues and cannot fathom the meanigness of your contributions,

I facedtiously apologize for these comments, but fail to understand why anybody has not yet deemed to put an end to this perpetual nonsense thus far.

Seriousely , enough already with your irrelavent lens performance specs. Did Brassai and Steiglits use your precious Apo-ronar bla-bla ? NO they did not.